期刊文献+

船舶抵押合同若干法律问题研究

Several Problems research on ship mortgage contract
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有的国家规定船舶抵押合同生效,船舶抵押权即可有效设立。而在有的国家,船舶抵押合同仅仅是双方的合意,并不产生设定船舶抵押权的法律后果。两种立法模式各有利弊。除基本内容以外,船舶抵押合同还应规定抵押船舶的保险、登记、转让、再抵押以及营运管理等内容。在我国,即使未采用书面形式,船舶抵押合同也是有效的,但无法创设船舶抵押权。 In some countries, the ship mortgage can be established as well as ship mortgage contract is effective. While in other countries, the ship mortgage contract does not bring the legal consequences of ship mortgage. Two legislative models have advantages and disadvantages. In addition to the basic content, the ship mortgage contract should also provide for the ship's mortgage insurance, registration, transfer, re-mortgage and operations management and so on. In China, without in written form, the ship mortgage contract is effective but it can not create a ship mortgage.
作者 刘安宁
机构地区 辽宁师范大学
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2012年第6期52-55,共4页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 船舶抵押合同 内容 书面形式 Ship mortgage contract Contents Written form
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1《俄罗斯联邦商船航运法典》第377条.
  • 2《意大利航海法典》第250条.
  • 3《俄罗斯联邦商船航运法典》第374条.
  • 4《挪威海商法》第41条.
  • 5《挪威海商法》第41条、第42条.
  • 6王轶.合同效力认定的若干问题[J].国家检察官学院学报,2010,18(5):151-160. 被引量:81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部