期刊文献+

两种手术方式治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者的效果比较 被引量:1

Effect Comparison of Two Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨两种手术方式治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者的效果。方法将120例高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者随机分为观察组65例与对照组55例,其中观察组采取髋动力锁定钢板治疗,对照组采取动力髋螺钉治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组治疗优良率达96.92%,显著优于对照组70.91%的治疗优良率(P<0.01);手术时间、术中出血量、X线暴露次数均显著优于对照组,观察组术后1例发生并发症,对照组7例发生并发症,两组比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结论髋动力锁定钢板治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折疗效确切,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To explore the effect of two surgical approaches for treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 120 cases of elderly patients with intertroehanterie fractures were randomly divided into observation group of 65 cases and control group of 55 cases. The observation group were given with hip power locking plates for treatment, control group were given with dynamic hip screws for treatment, to compare the clinical efficacy of the two groups. Results The treatment excellent rate of the observation group was 96.92%, significantly higher than the excellent rate of 70.91% of the control group (P 〈0.01); The operative time, blood loss volume, X-ray exposure times were significantly better than those of the control group. One patient in the observation group occurred with postoperative complications, 7 cases of patients in the control group occurred with postoperative complications, the difference was significant (P 〈0.05). Conclusions Hip power locking plates for treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures have exact curative effect, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2012年第12期2172-2173,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 股骨粗隆间骨折 锁定钢板 DHS内固定 Femoral intertrochanteric fracture Locking plate DHS internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1张长青.LISS—不仅仅是一项骨折微创内固定的技术[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(2):154-155. 被引量:45
  • 2吴征杰,区锦燕,廖荣宗,罗富荣,周曙.活血祛瘀中药加诺氯昔康对创伤骨折后高凝状态的影响[J].中国骨伤,2005,18(5):257-259. 被引量:10
  • 3高少茹,林惠卿,郭少英,许雪华,陈银崧,刘春梅.渭良伤科油治疗老年卧床患者Ⅰ期压疮的效果观察[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(2):179-180. 被引量:40
  • 4竺亚,傅国美.老年髋关节置换术后深静脉栓塞的预防及护理[J].浙江预防医学,2007,19(1):73-73. 被引量:6
  • 5Haidukewych GJ.Israel TA.berry DJ.Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric regionof the femur[J].Bone Joint Surg Am,2001,83A(5):643.
  • 6Hsueh K K, Fang C K, Chen C M. Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of ,937 pa- tients[J]. Int Orthop,2010,34(8) : 127,3-1276.
  • 7Little N J, Verma V, Fernando C. A prospective trial comparing the Holland nail with the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of in- tertrochanteric fractures of the hip[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2008, 90(8):1073-1078.
  • 8Ahn J, Bernstein J. Fractures in brief: intertrochanteric hip frac tures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2010,468(5):1450-1452.
  • 9Haidukewych G J. Intertrochanteric fractures: ten tips to improve result[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) ,2009,91(3) :712-719.
  • 10Sahin S, Erttirer E, Ozturk I. Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PF- NA) in the treatment of unstable intertroehanteric femoral frac- tures[J]. Acta OrthopTraumatolTurc,2010,44(2):127- 134.

共引文献15

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部