摘要
目的探讨收缩压(SBP)、LDL—C对颈动脉斑块的影响。方法在参加2006--2009年健康体检的101510名某公司在职及离退休职工中,按年龄、性别比例分层随机抽取5852名作为观察队列,于2010—2011年对观察队列进行健康体检,同时进行了颈动脉超声检查,最后符合入选标准和资料完整的为5361名,将其分为SBP及LDL—C正常(3524名)、SBP正常但LDL—C升高(356名)、SBP升高但LDL-C正常(1308名)、SBP及LDL-C升高(173名)共4组。计算各组颈动脉斑块的检出率及加权率,并采用logistic回归分析SBP及LDL—C水平对颈动脉斑块检出率的影响。结果SBP及LDL—C正常、SBP正常但LDL—C升高、SBP升高但LDL—C正常、SBP及LDL—C升高组颈动脉斑块检出率分别为33.7%(1186/3524)、41.3%(147/356)、64.8%(847/1308)、68.8%(119/173)(X^2=425.75,P〈0.05),加权检出率分别为36.0%、42.0%、64.5%、68.3%;男性颈动脉斑块的检出率分别为44.2%(877/1985)、51.1%(97/190)、70.6%(657/930)、71.3%(82/115)(X^2=194.02,P〈0.05),加权率分别为31.2%、36.1%、49.8%、50.3%;女性分别为20.1%(309/1539)、30.1%(50/166)、50.3%(190/378)、63.8%(37/58)(X^2=180.17,P〈0.05),加权检出率分别为30.9%、46.3%、70.3%、88.1%,校正其他因素后,与SBP及LDL-C正常组相比,SBP正常LDL-C升高、SBP升高LDL—C正常、SBP及LDL—C升高组的OR(95%CI)值分别为1.37(1.05~1.78),2.05(1.74~2.43),2.12(1.45~3.12)。结论高SBP与高LDL—C是颈动脉斑块形成的危险因素,与高LDL—C相比,高SBP引起颈动脉斑块的风险更大。
Objective To explore the different effects of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low density lipoprotein on carotid plaques(LDL-C). Methods A total of 101 510 serving and retired workers of a company who participated in the health examination in 2006 - 2009, 5852 participants were selected as study subjects by stratified random sampling according to the age and sex ratio. These subjects took their health examination in 2010 -2011 including the carotid ultrasound. Finally, 5361 eligible participants with complete data were included in the analysis. The detection and weighted rates of carotid plaques were calculated for four groups : normal SBP and LDL-C group ( 3524 subjects), normal SBP and high LDL-C group (356 subjects),elevated SBP and normal LDL-C group (1308 subjects) and elevated SBP and high LDL-C group (173 subjects). The effects of different baseline SBP and LDL-C on detection rates of the carotid artery plaques were analyzed by logistic regression. Results The detection rate of carotid plaques in normal SBP and LDL-C group, normal SBP and high LDL-C group, elevated SBP and normal LDL-C group , elevated SBP and high LDL-C group was 33.7% (1186/3524) ,41.3% (147/356) ,64. 8% (847/1308), 68.8% (119/173) (X^2 = 425.75 ,P 〈 0. 05) and the weighted detection rate was 36. 0% ,42. 0% ,64. 5% and 68. 3% respectively. For men, the detection rate was 44. 2% (877/1985) ,51.1% (97/190), 70. 6% (657/930) ,71.3% ( 82/115 ) ( X^2 = 194. 02, P 〈 0.05 ) and the weighted detection rate was 31.2%, 36. 1% ,49. 8% and 50. 3% respectively. For women, the detection rate was 20. 1% (309/1539) ,30. 1% (50/166) ,50. 3% ( 190/378 ), 63.8% ( 37/58 ) ( X^2 = 180. 17, P 〈 O. 05 ) and the weighted detection rate was 30.9% ,46. 3% ,70.3%, and 88.1% respectively. After adjusted for other risk factors, the OR (95%(?/) value was 1.37 (1.05 -1.78),2.05(1.74-2.43) and 2. 12 (1.45 -3.12) for normalSBP and high LDL-C group, elevated SBP and normal LDL-C group and elevated SBP and high LDL-C group respectively compared with normal SBP and LDL-C group. Conclusion Elevated SBP and high LDL-C were risk factors of the carotid artery plaques. Compared with high LDL-C, elevated SBP may add a higher risk for carotid plaques.
出处
《中华预防医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第12期1074-1078,共5页
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金
国家十一五科技支撑计划(2008BA152803)
关键词
血压
脂蛋白类
LDL
颈动脉
流行病学研究
Blood pressure
Lipoproteins, LDL
Carotid arteries
Epidemiologic studies