期刊文献+

艾司西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗伴焦虑症状抑郁症患者疗效比较 被引量:14

Escitalopram and sertraline in treatment of depression with anxiety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较艾司西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗伴焦虑症状的抑郁症疗效和安全性。方法:76例符合入组标准的患者随机分为艾司西酞普兰组和盐酸舍曲林组各38例,疗程6周。用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评定疗效,采用治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定安全性。结果:两组HAMD、HAMA评分均较治疗前显著降低(P<0.01),以艾司西酞普兰组HAMD、HAMA评分在治疗1周时降分显著低于盐酸舍曲林组(t=-2.839,-2.862;P<0.01),其余各周差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。艾司西酞普兰组与舍曲林组不良反应发生率分别为39.5%和42.1%(P>0.05)。结论:艾司西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗伴焦虑症状的抑郁症疗效相当,但艾司西酞普兰起效更快。 Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of escitalopram and sertraline in the treatment of depression with anxiety.Method:76 of patients with depression with anxiety were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram(n=38) or sertraline(n=38) for up to 6 weeks in this randomized,parallel-group study.The rapeutic efficacy was assessed with Hamilton depression scale(HAMD-17) and Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA).Safety profile was assessed with treatment emergent symptom scale(TESS).Results:The mean values of HAMD-17 and HAMA total scores improved significantly for both groups from the baseline to the end of week 6th(P0.01).At the end of the first week,the total scores of HAMD and HAMA in the group of escitalopram were significant lower than that of group of sertraline(t=-2.839,-2.862;P0.01),but there were no statistically significant differences between two groups at the end of week 2,4 and 6th(P0.05).The incidences of side effects were 39.5% in escitalopram group and 42.1% in sertraline group(P0.05).Conclusion:The therapeutic effect and side effect on depression with anxiety are not different between escitalopram and sertraline.Escitalopram has earlier response than sertraline.
机构地区 苏州市广济医院
出处 《临床精神医学杂志》 2012年第6期419-420,共2页 Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
关键词 抑郁症 焦虑 艾司西酞普兰 舍曲林 depression anxiety symptom escitalopram sertraline
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Bandelow B. Epidemiology of depression and anxiety. Handbook on depression and anxiety[ M. New York : Marce Dekker,2003:49-68.
  • 2Brown C, Schulberg HC, Madonia M J, et al. Treatment outcomes for primary care patients with major depression and lifetime anxiety disorders [ J ]. Am J Psychiatry, 1996,153 : 1293-1300.
  • 3Bandelow B,Andersen HF, Dolberg OT. Escitalopram in the treat- ment of anxiety symptoms associated with depression [ J ]. Depres- sion and Anxiety,2007,24:53-61.
  • 4Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants:a multiple- treatments meta-analysis J . Lancet,2009,73:746-758.
  • 5钱敏才,沈鑫华,林敏.艾司西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗门诊抑郁症的对照研究[J].上海精神医学,2007,19(2):95-97. 被引量:51
  • 6邵阿林,刘军军,吴兵,陈伟,杨玉如.艾司西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗老年抑郁症疗效研究[J].实用老年医学,2009,23(6):467-469. 被引量:20

二级参考文献9

  • 1唐伟,黄文武.西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗抑郁症的对照研究[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(2):87-88. 被引量:12
  • 2钱敏才,沈鑫华,林敏.艾司西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗门诊抑郁症的对照研究[J].上海精神医学,2007,19(2):95-97. 被引量:51
  • 3刘建农 居云龙.舍曲林与氟西汀治疗老年抑郁障碍对照观察[J].临床精神医学杂志,2001,11:111-111.
  • 4Colonna L, Andersen HF, Reines EH. A randomized, double- blind,24-week study of escitalopram (10 rag/day) versus citalopram( 20mg/day) in primary with major depressive disorder [ J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2005, 21 ( 10): 1659-1668.
  • 5Fava M, Davidson KG. Definition and epidemiology of treatment resistant depression[J].Psychiatr Clin North Am, 1996,19 (2) : 179-213.
  • 6Colonna L,Andersen HF,Reines EH.A randomized,doubleblind,24 -week study of escitalopram(10mg/day) versus citalopram (20 m/day) in primary care patients with major depressive disorder.Curr Med Res Opin,2005,21(10):1659 -1668
  • 7Moore N,Verdoux H,Fantino B.Prospective,multicentre,randomized,double-blind study of the efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram in outpatient treatment of major depressive disorder.Int Clin Psychopharmcol,2005,20:131-137
  • 8刘珊,田博.艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症对照研究[J].精神医学杂志,2008,21(4):271-272. 被引量:29
  • 9张玉琦,李桂林,廉恩勇,姬玉平.舍曲林与阿米替林治疗老年抑郁症对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2000,10(4):212-213. 被引量:16

共引文献61

同被引文献75

引证文献14

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部