期刊文献+

MRS诊断前列腺癌准确率与病理切片Gleason评分的相关性研究 被引量:6

A correlation study of Gleason score and the diagnostic accuracy of MRS in prostate cancer based on pathological section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过前列腺MRS和同区病理切片结果的对照研究,探讨MR波谱(MRS)诊断前列腺癌(PCa)的准确率及其与Gleason评分间的关系。方法:将5例PCa患者PCa根治术后的离体标本,以术前前列腺MRS定位像的最大横径层为标准取层。以MRS兴趣区(ROI)各体素为标准分割兴趣层标本,制成与MRS结果一一对应的病理切片。将MRS波谱变化与病理结果进行同区对照,评价(胆碱+肌酸)/枸橼酸盐((choline+creatine)/citrate,CC/C)值与Gleason评分间的关系。按Gleason评分的不同,对病理确诊的前列腺癌区进行分组。通过Spearman相关分析探讨不同Gleason评分下MRS诊断PCa的准确率。结果:共取得有效病理结果90个。以CC/C值>0.86为诊断PCa的标准,MRS诊断的有癌区65个,无癌区25个,与病理结果一致的分别为59个及14个。PCa CC/C值与Gleason评分呈正相关,具有统计学意义(r=0.746,P=0.000)。Gleason评分6分组,MRS诊断PCa的准确率为50%;Gleason评分7分组诊断准确率为53.8%;Gleason评分8分组诊断准确率为72%;Gleason评分9分和10分组诊断准确率均为100%。经Spearman相关分析,MRS诊断PCa的准确率与Gleason评分呈正相关,结果具有统计学意义(r=0.223,P=0.034)。结论:MRS诊断PCa的准确率与Gleason评分呈正相关,提示MRS诊断PCa的准确率随肿瘤恶性度的增高而上升。 Objective: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in prostate cancer (PCa) and its correlation with Gleason score by making a comparative study of prostate MRS and the corresponding pathologi cal section. Methods: Radical perineal prostatectomy was performed in 5 patients with PCa. Before operation, all the patients underwent prostate MRS scanning. According to the widest cross section in prostate 3D-MRS image, the interested layer of radical prostatectomy specimens were selected and sliced. On the basis of MRS voxels, the interested layer was cut into 15- 35 pieces equally. Each piece was numbered in agreement with the order of MRS voxels and made into pathological sections. The diagnosis of MRS was compared to pathological finding in the same area. The correlation between the ratio of (choline+creatine)/citrate(CC/C) and Gleason score was evaluated. According to the difference of Gleason score, the PCa regions were di vided into several groups. The relationship of Gleason score and diagnostic accuracy of MRS in PCa was researched by Spear man's rank correlation analysis. Results: 90 regions with valid pathologic diagnosis were obtained in total. Using CC/C〉0.86 as the diagnostic standard, 65 cancer-affected regions and 25 cancer-free regions were diagnosed by MRS, among which the results consistent with pathologic diagnosis were 59 and 14, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between the ratio of CC/C and Gleason score of PCa(r=0.746, P=0.000). In group l(Gleason score=6), the diagnostic accuracy of MRS in PCa was 50%. In group 2(Gleason score=7), the diagnostic accuracy was 53.8%. In group 3(Gleason score=8), the diagnos tic accuracy was 72%. In group 4(Gleason score=9) and group 5(Gleason score=10), the diagnostic accuracy was 100%. Spear man's rank correlation analysis showed that the diagnostic accuracy of MRS in PCa was significant positively correlated to the Gleason score (r=0.223, P=0.034). Conclusion: The correlation between the diagnostic accuracy of MRS in PCa and Gleason score was significant positive. The diagnostic accuracy of MRS in PCa may gradually increased with the malignant degree of PCa.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2012年第12期860-863,共4页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 磁共振波谱学 Prostatic neoplasms Magnetic resonance spectroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kurth J, Defeo E, Cheng LL. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a promising tool for the diagnostics of human prostate cancer[J]. Urol Oncol, 2011, 29(5): 562-571.
  • 2Zakian KL, Sircar K, Hricak H, et al. Correlation of Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging with Gleason Score Based on Step-Section Pathologic Analysis after Radical Prostatectomy [J]. Radiology,2005, 234(3): 804-814.
  • 3Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Hricak H, et al. Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high spatial resolution[J]. Radiology, 1996, 198(3): 795-805.
  • 4Scheidler J, Hricak H, Vigneron DB, et al. Prostate cancer: lo- calization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imag- ing-clinicopathologic study[J]. Radiology, 1999, 213(2): 473-480.
  • 5Amsellem-Ouazana D, Younes P, Conquy S, et al. Negative pro- static biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer. Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spec- troscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool? A preliminary study[J]. Eur Urol, 2005, 47(5): 582-586.
  • 6Giusti S, Caramella D, Fruzzetti E, et al. Peripheral zone prostate cancer. Pre-treatment evaluation with MR and 3D IH MR spec- troscopic imaging: correlation with pathologic findings [J]. Abdom [maging, 2010, 35(6): 757-763.
  • 7van Asten JJ, Cuijpers V, Hulsbergen-vande Kaa C, et al. High resolution magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy for metabolic assessment of cancer presence and Gleason score in human prostate needle biopsies[J]. MAGM, 2008, 21(6): 435-442.
  • 8Villeirs GM, De Meerleer GO, De Visschere P J, et al. Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the assessment of high grade prostate carcinoma in patients with elevated PSA: a single-institution experience of 356 patients [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 77(2): 340-345.
  • 9王霄英,周良平,李飞宇,丁建平,山刚志,蒋学祥.前列腺癌的MR波谱特征与Gleason评分的关系[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(11):1181-1184. 被引量:28
  • 10赵阳,徐勇,韩悦,张志宏,刘冉录.MR波谱成像对前列腺癌分化程度预估价值的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(10):951-954. 被引量:12

二级参考文献38

  • 1王霄英,周良平,丁建平,李飞宇,山刚志,肖江喜,蒋学祥.RS对中国人前列腺癌鉴别诊断标准的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(8):1150-1153. 被引量:97
  • 2王霄英,周良平,丁建平,王刚,肖江喜,蒋学祥.中国正常成年男性前列腺的MRS定量分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2003,19(5):576-578. 被引量:24
  • 3夏同礼,孔祥田,苏晋伟,郭应禄.前列腺潜伏癌的初步调查[J].中华医学杂志,1995,75(9):565-566. 被引量:5
  • 4黄杰,肖明辉,杨小华.前列腺癌50例诊断分析[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2005,20(9):553-554. 被引量:2
  • 5汪清,王胜军,毕兴,马力克.伊斯哈科夫,郭峰,艾合买提.卡德尔.前列腺穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断及分期中的临床意义[J].新疆医科大学学报,2005,28(9):820-821. 被引量:1
  • 6Djavan B,Ravery V,Zlotta A,et al.Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1,2,3 and 4:when should we stop? J Urol,2001,166(5):1679-1683.
  • 7Scheidler J,Hricak H,Vigneron DB,et al.Prostate cancer:localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging-clinicopathologic study.Radiology,1999,213(2):473-480.
  • 8Wefer AE,Hricak H,Vigneron DB,et al.Sextant localization of prostate cancer:comparison of sextant biopsy,magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology.J Urol,2000,164(2):400-404.
  • 9Shukla-Dave A,Hricak H,Eberhardt SC,et al.Chronic prostatitis:MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopic imaging findings-initial observations.Radiology,2004,231(3):717-724.
  • 10Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Kattan MW, et al. The utility of magnetic resonance inmging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis. BJU Int,2007, 99:786-793.

共引文献62

同被引文献99

  • 1李可,方永昆.前列腺MR波谱分析与前列腺癌血清PSA检测在前列腺癌诊断中的比较研究[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(9):452-452. 被引量:1
  • 2王霄英,周良平,丁建平,李飞宇,山刚志,肖江喜,蒋学祥.RS对中国人前列腺癌鉴别诊断标准的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(8):1150-1153. 被引量:97
  • 3钱均琪,张绍渤,黄受方.前列腺癌的病理学进展[J].中华病理学杂志,1996,25(4):253-255. 被引量:20
  • 4李飞宇,王霄英,许玉峰,肖江喜,蒋学祥.不同年龄段正常成人前列腺外周带ADC值的初步研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(12):1496-1499. 被引量:16
  • 5Wu CL,Jordan KW, Ratai EM, et al. Metabolomic imaging for human prostate cancer detection. Sci-ence Translational Med,2010,2 : 16 Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines. Eur Radiol,2012 ,22 :746.
  • 6Gtirses B, Kabakci N, Kovanlikaya A, et al, Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal prostate at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol,2008,18:716.
  • 7Tamada T, Sone T, Toshimitsu S, et al. Age-related and zonal ana- tomical changes of" apparent dif- fusion coefficient values ix normal human prostatic tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging,2008,27:552.
  • 8Gtirses B,Tasdelen N,Yencilek F,et al. Diagnostic utility of DTI in prostate cancer. EuJ Radio1,2011,79 :172.
  • 9Xu J, Humphrey PA, Kibel AS, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristic of histologically defined prostate cancer in humans. Magn Reson Med ,2009,61:842.
  • 10Manenti G, Carlani M, Mancino S, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonace imaging of prostate-cancer. Invest Radio1,2007 ,42 :412.

引证文献6

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部