期刊文献+

不同取石方法在嵌顿性输尿管上段结石中的治疗对比 被引量:25

Comparison the healing effect between minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for impacted upper ureteral calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对不同取石方法在嵌顿性输尿管上段结石中的治疗效果进行对比。方法选取该院收治的嵌顿性输尿管上段结石患者57例,根据手术方式不同分为腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术组(RLUL组)29例及微创经皮肾穿刺钬激光碎石术组(MPCNL组)28例。对两组患者术前各项基本资料、手术时间、结石清除率、血红蛋白下降情况、术后住院时间及并发症情况进行对比。结果研究发现,RLUL组手术时间[(71.5±11.6)min]与MPCNL组时间[(44.2±8.7)min]比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RLUL组结石清除率(93.1%)高于MPCNL组(85.3%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。RLUL组血红蛋白下降0.43g/L,MPCNL组下降0.78g/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后两组患者术后高热、肉眼血尿、输尿管狭窄以及术后尿漏对比,并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 MPCNL和RLUL在复杂性上输尿管结石治疗中均有较高的结石清除率,术后恢复快及术后并发症少的优点。临床治疗时可根据医疗条件或者患者的病情作出适当的选择。 Objective Compare the healing effect of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in impacted upper ureteral calculi.Methods A total of 57 impacted upper ureteral calculi patients were selected in our hospital.Patients were divided into RLUL group(29 case) and MPCNL group(28 case)according to operation methods,to compare the basic material preoperative,operation time,stones clearance,hemoglobin down,postoperative hospitalization time and complications between two groups.Results Compare the material of two groups during preoperative shows,RLUL group′s operation time was 71.5+11.6 min,MPCNL group was 44.2+8.7 min,the difference has statistically significance(P0.05).The stones clearance rate of RLUL group(93.1%) higher than the MPCNL group(85.3%),but the result has no statistical significance(P0.05).The hemoglobin down in RLUL group was 0.43 g/L,and 0.78% in MPCNL group,the result has statistical difference(P0.05).The postoperative high fever,the naked eye hematuria,ureteral stricture and postoperative urine leakage shows there were no statistical difference between two groups(P0.05).Conclusion Both MPCNL and RLUL in impacted upper ureteral calculi have high stones clearance rate,high postoperative recovery,and low surgical complications advantages.A proper choice can be made according to the condition of a specific patient and medical conditions.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第36期3828-3829,3832,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 肾造口术 经皮 后腹腔镜输尿管取石术 输尿管结石 nephrostomy percutaneous minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy ureteral calculi
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Nerli RB, Patil SM, Guntaka AK, et al. Flexible ureteros- copy for upper ureteral calculi in children[J]. J Endourol, 2011,25(4) :579-582.
  • 2Kumar A, Mohanty NK, Jain M, et al. A prospective ran- domized comparison between early(48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi:a single center experi- ence[J]. J Endourol, 2010,24(12) : 2059-2066.
  • 3Singh SK, Pawar DS, Griwan MS, et al. Role of tamsulo- sin in clearance of upper ureteral calculi after extracorpo- real shock wave lithotripsy., a randomized controlled trial [J]. Urol J,2011,8(1) 14-20.
  • 4Skolarikos A, Mitsogiannis H, Deliveliotis C, et al. Indica- tions, prediction of success and methods to improve out- come of shock wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteral calculi[J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl,2010,82(1) :56-63.
  • 5胡卫列,曹启友,罗积慎,王蔚,张利朝,罗丽东,何恢绪,吕军.输尿管结石ESWL治疗失败后输尿管镜下治疗[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(3):219-220. 被引量:15
  • 6Skolarikos A,Mitsogiannis H,Deliveliotis C. et al. Indica tions,prediction of success and methods to improve out- come of shock wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteral calculi [J] Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2 010,8 2 ( 1 ) : 5 6-6 3.
  • 7Fan T, Xian P, Yang L, et al. Experience and learning curve of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral calculi[J]. J Endourol, 2009,23 ( 11 ) : 1867- 1870.
  • 8解忠,于跃平,汪健平,李松.孤立肾肾结石致急性肾功能衰竭16例的处理[J].云南医药,2010,31(3):316-316. 被引量:2
  • 9Ray K. PCNL and staghorn kidney stones[J]. Nat Rev Urol,2011,8(3) : 116.
  • 10Chen Y,Zhou Z,Sun W,et al. Minimally invasive percuta- neous nephrolithotomy under peritubal local infiltration anesthesia[J]. World J Urol,2011,29(6): 773-777.

二级参考文献5

共引文献15

同被引文献161

  • 1孙建刚,马成民,张超.ESWL治疗肾及输尿管结石的效果观察与分析(附497例报告)[J].安徽医学,2009,30(9):1060-1061. 被引量:5
  • 2肖耀军,邵志强,张明,王海坤,王建平,黄谷,李彬.微创治疗输尿管结石3种不同方法比较(附326例报告)[J].南方医科大学学报,2009,29(7):1448-1450. 被引量:17
  • 3张小平,孙玉成,刘凤祝,何学松.后腹腔镜联合软输尿管镜治疗肾盂结石[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(11):3345-3347. 被引量:2
  • 4叶向东,梁志雄.微创经皮肾取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2006,11(2):72-74. 被引量:28
  • 5Hsiao HI_,, Huang SP, Wu W J, et al. hnpact of hydronephrosis on treatment outcome of solitary proximal ureteral stone 'after extra- corporeal shock wave lithotripsy [ J ]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci ,2008, 24(10) :507-513.
  • 6Hunayan AA, Khalil M, Hassabo M, et al. Management of solitary renal pelvic stone., laparoscopic retroperitoneal py- elolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. J Endourol,2011,25(6) :975-978.
  • 7Wang XH, Li S. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis [J]. J Urol, 2013,190(3) : 888-893.
  • 8Bader MJ, Eisner B, Porpiglia F, et al. Contemporary man- agement of ureteral stones[J]. Eur Urol, 2012,61 (4) : 764-772.
  • 9Rosette CH, Opondo D,Daels PJ, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the elavien score for per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2012,62 (2) 246-255.
  • 10Atis G,Gurbuz C, Arikan O, et al. Ureteroscopic manage ment with laser lithotripsy of renal pelvic stones[J]. J En- dourol,2012,26(8) :983-987.

引证文献25

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部