摘要
目的比较超声电导经皮靶向给药和口服给药对慢性细菌性前列腺炎的治疗效果。方法 30例慢性细菌性前列腺炎患者,15例采用超声电导经皮靶向给药,15例采用口服药物治疗作为对照组,观察和评定治疗效果及副反应。结果两组患者均取得较好疗效,观察组疗效和细菌清除率与对照组相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但前者治疗基本无痛苦,疗程短,副反应少。结论超声电导经皮靶向给药治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎与口服给药相比疗效相似,但副反应更少,值得推荐应用于临床。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects for the chronic bacterial prostatitis with transdermal administration or oral administration. Methods Among 30 patients with the chronic bacterial prostatitis, 15 were treated with transdermal administration,and the others were treated with bral administration. The therapeutic effects and side effects were observed and evaluated. Results Both the methods were available. The effect of the treatment group waw similar with that of the contrast group,which had no a statistical significance(P〉0.05). The former had no complaints,a shorter course of treatment and less side effects. Conclusion The treatment by ultrasound and conductance method with transdermal administration is deserved to use for the chronic bacterial prostatitis.
出处
《检验医学与临床》
CAS
2012年第24期3081-3082,共2页
Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词
慢性细菌性前列腺炎
超声
电导
经皮给药
chronic bacterial prostatitis
ultrasound
conductance
transdermal administration