期刊文献+

AHM分类方法的改良 被引量:1

Improvement of Classification Methods of AHM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对AHM模型2种基于IRT的判别方法——方法 A和方法 B进行改良,得到方法 C和方法 D.通过蒙特卡洛模拟试验考察A、B、C、D等4种方法的诊断性能.结果表明:蒙特卡洛模拟试验的结果与理论研究结果相符,方法 C优于方法 A,方法 D优于方法 B,且从总体上看新方法的评价指标比对应原方法的评价指标有较大幅度的提高. Two traditional methods, Method A and Method B, based on item response theory are presented by Leighton to illustrate the classification of observed response patterns in the AHM. But their diagnostic accuracy is not high. This study presents two new classification methods, Method C and Method D, based on item response theory, which varied from the two traditional methods. A Monte Carlo simulation experiment is designed tO explore the performance of different methods. The results show that the diagnostic performance of new methods is better than the traditional methods. The pattern match ratio (PMR) and marginal match ratio (MMR) of Method C is higher than Method A. The pattern match ratio (PMR) and marginal match ratio (MMR) of Method D is higher than Method B.
出处 《华南师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第4期138-141,145,共5页 Journal of South China Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划教育部重点项目(GFA111009) 华南师范大学青年教师科研培育基金项目
关键词 认知诊断 AHM模型 判别方法 cognitive diagnosis AHM classification methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1TATSUOKA K. A probabilistic model for diagnosing mis- conceptions in the pattern classification approach [ J ]. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1985, 10:55-73.
  • 2文剑冰.规则空间模型在诊断性计算机自适应测验中的应用[D].香港:香港中文大学,2003.
  • 3张敏强,简小珠,陈秋梅.规则空间模型在瑞文智力测验中的认知诊断分析[J].心理科学,2011,34(2):266-271. 被引量:7
  • 4LEIGHTON J P, GIERL M J. Cognitive diagnostic assess- ment for education: Theory and applications [ M ]. Cam- bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,2007:242 -274.
  • 5CUI Y, LEIGHTON J P, ZHENG Y. Simulation studies for evaluating the performance of the two classification methods in the AHM [ R ]. San Francisco, CA: The an- nual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, 2006.
  • 6丁树良,汪文义,杨淑群.认知诊断测验蓝图的设计[J].心理科学,2011,34(2):258-265. 被引量:70

二级参考文献31

共引文献72

同被引文献37

  • 1康春花,戴海崎.采用LLTM作测量与认知结合研究的初步探讨[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):569-572. 被引量:17
  • 2余嘉元.运用规则空间模型识别解题中的认知错误[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 3余嘉元.关于新课程改革中的诊断性测验研究[J].教育探索,2006(5):24-25. 被引量:7
  • 4Glaser R. The future of testing:A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics[J].{H}American Psychologists,1981,(09):923.
  • 5Nichols P D. A framework for developing cognitively diagnostic assessments[J].{H}Review of Educational Research,1994,(04):575-603.
  • 6Stout W. Psychometrics:From practice to theory and back[J].{H}PSYCHOMETRIKA,2002,(04):485-518.
  • 7Leighton,J,M.Gierl. Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education:Theory and applications[M].{H}Cambridge University Press,2007.
  • 8Tatsuoka,K.K. Cognitive assessment:An introduction to the rule space method[M].Routledge New York,NY,2009.
  • 9Rupp,A,J.Templin,R.Henson. Diagnostic measurement:Theory,methods,and applications[M].Guilford Press,2010.
  • 10Tatsuoka,K.K. Architecture of knowledge structures and cognitive diagnosis:A statistical pattern recognition and classification approach[M].Erlbaum:Hillsdale,1995.327-359.

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部