期刊文献+

博弈论视角的多属性逆向拍卖评标行为研究 被引量:4

Study of bid evaluation behaviors for multi-attribute reverse auction based on game theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 技术属性和商务属性间强负相关性会诱导两组评标专家间的对立情绪和不合作行为,评标管理部门对评标专家的组织管理是评标公平性的重要因素.以博弈论为工具分别建立了多属性逆向拍卖分组评标机制下技术专家和商务专家之间、管理部门与评标专家之间行为的理论模型和研究框架,分析了纯策略纳什均衡解存在的条件.然后,分析了影响技术与商务专家、管理部门与评标专家之间策略选择的因素,揭示了评标参数对均衡的影响.为便于研究博弈主体行为,基于Matlab GUI平台开发了分组多属性逆向拍卖评标和管理行为仿真系统.数值仿真了评标环境的改变和决策参数的不同对均衡结果的影响. There is usually strong negative relevance between technical and business attributes in current bid evaluation process. It will induce the antagonistic feelings and non-cooperation behavior between two groups. Administrative department's organiza- tional administration is a key factor to fairness. Based on game theory, models about bid evaluation behaviors are constructed to analyze the conditions how to achieve equi- librium, one is about technical and business experts and the other is about experts and administrative department, and which is the Pure Strategies Nash Equilibrium. Then, the influencing factors to relative behaviors are analyzed. At last, the simulation system about the game is developed and runs on the platform of Matlab GUI with adjusting relevant parameters.
出处 《运筹学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期11-20,共10页 Operations Research Transactions
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(Nos.70931001 61273203 60821063)
关键词 多属性逆向拍卖 行为运筹学 分组多属性评标 博弈论 行为分析 multi-attribute reverse auction, behavior operation management, grouped bid evaluation, zame theory, behavioral analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Lai K K, Liu S L, Wang S Y. A method used for evaluating bids in the Chinese constructionindustry [J]. International Journal of Project Management' 2004,22: 193-201.
  • 2Peters C, Bodkin C D. An exploratory investigation of problematic online auction behaviors:experiences of ebay users [J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2007, 14: 1-16.
  • 3Loch C H, Wu Y. Behavioral operations management, in foundations and trends in technology[J]. Information and Operations Management, 2007, 1(3).
  • 4Adomavicius G,Curley S P, Gupta A. Effect of information feedback on bidder behavior incontinuous combinatorial auctions [J]. Management Science, 2012,58(4): 811-830.
  • 5易余胤,肖条军,盛昭瀚.合作研发中机会主义行为的演化博弈分析[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(4):80-87. 被引量:106
  • 6Tunca T I, Wu Q. Multiple sourcing and procurement process selection with bidding events[J]. Management Science^ 2009, 55: 763-780.
  • 7Perrone G, Roma P, Nigro G L. Designing multi-attribute auctions for engineering servicesprocurement in new product development in the automotive context [J]. International Journalof Production Economics、2010, 124: 20-31.
  • 8丁占文,蔡超英,杨宏林,蒋书敏.不完全博弈学习过程的虚拟行动规则[J].运筹学学报,2010,14(3):91-100. 被引量:4
  • 9Wang D W, Liu X W, Liu L L. Bid evaluation behavior in online procurement auctions involv-ing technical and business experts [J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2012.10.001.
  • 10汪定伟.分组的多属性逆向拍卖的评标行为分析[C]∥第五届(2010)中国管理学年会.天津,2010.

二级参考文献18

  • 1Fudenberg D., Levine D.K. The Theory of Learning in Games[M]. The MIT Press, London, 1998.
  • 2Fudenberg D., Levine D.K. Consistency and cautious fictitious play[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1995, 19: 1065-1090.
  • 3Krishna V., Sjostrom T. On the convergence of fictitious play[M]. Mimeo: Harvard University, 1995.
  • 4Monder D., Samet D., Sela A, A 2×2 game without the fictitious play property[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 1996, 14: 144-148.
  • 5Ulrich Berger. Fictitious play in 2 × n games[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2005, 120: 139-154.
  • 6Ulrich Berger. Two more classes of games with the continuous-time fictitious play property[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2007, 60: 247-261.
  • 7Sunku Hahn. The convergence of fictitious play in games with strategic complementarities[J]. Economics Letters, 2008, 99: 304-306.
  • 8Beatb J, Poyage J A, Ulph D. Organization design and information-sharing in a research joint venture with spillovers[J]. Bulletin of Economic Research, 1998, 50: 47-59.
  • 9Petit M L, Tolwinski B. R&D cooperation or competition[J]. European Economic Review, 1998, 43: 185-208.
  • 10Rajiv Sethi, Somanathan E. Understanding reciprocity[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2003, 50: 1-27.

共引文献111

同被引文献79

引证文献4

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部