期刊文献+

急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者的血脂因素水平分析 被引量:3

Analysis for lipid levels in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究的目的是评价急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者的血脂因素水平。方法研究共入选194例急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者作为研究组及82例经皮冠状动脉造影术排除冠心病的患者作为对照组,应用logistic多因素回归分析方法及ROC曲线下面积评价各种血脂水平及血脂比值与急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的关系。结果急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者的各项血脂水平明显高于对照组,应用logistic多因素回归分析显示非HDL-C是目前常规血脂检测中评价发生急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的最佳指标。结论高脂血症是患者发生急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的重要危险因素之一,非HDL-C是预测急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的较好指标。 Objective Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was one of the main death causes of cardio- vascular disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lipid levels for the patient with acute ST-segment ele- vation myocardial infarction. Methods We collected 194 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarc- tion patients as the study group and 82 cases for exclude coronary heart disease by percutaneous coronary angiogra- phy as control group. We evaluated various of lipid levels and lipid ratios in patients with acute ST-segment eleva- tion myocardial infarction by logistic multivariate regression analysis and under the ROC curve area methods. Re- suits The patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were significantly higher than the control group on lipid levels. The logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that non-HDL-C was the best indicator of the conventional lipid testing in the evaluation of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Conclusions Hyperlipidemia is an important risk factor in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The non-HDL-C was a better indicator to predict acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
出处 《中国医刊》 CAS 2012年第12期30-32,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medicine
关键词 急性ST段抬高心肌梗死 非HDL-C logistic多因素回归分析 ROC曲线下面积 acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction non-HDL-C logistic multivariate regression analy- sis under the ROC curve area
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Goswami B, Mallika V, RajappaM, et al. Apo-B/Apo-AI ratio: a better discriminator of coronary artery disease risk than other conventional lipid ratios in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction [J]. Acta Cardiol,2008, 63:749-755.
  • 2Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined a consensus document of the joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2000, 36:959- 969.
  • 3Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, et al. Inflammation and Carotid Artery - Risk for Atherosclerosis Study (ICARAS) [J]. Circulation,2005, 111:2203-2209.
  • 4American Diabetic Association. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 1997, 20 : 1183-1201.
  • 5Binita G, Medha R, Baidarbhi C, et al. Comparison of the various lipid ratios and indices for risk assessment in patients of myocardial infarction[ J]. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists, 2012, 45:445-449.
  • 6Sniderman AD, Furberg CD, Keech A, et al. Apolipoproteins versus lipids as indices of coronary risk and as targets of statin treatment [J]. Lancet,2003, 361:777-780.
  • 7Sacks FM. The apolipoprotein story [J]. Atherosclerosis,2006, 7 : 23 -27.
  • 8Packard C J, Saito Y. Non-HDL cholesterol as a measure of atherosclerotic risk[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb,2004, 11:6-14.
  • 9Liu J, Sempos C, Donahue RP, et al. Joint distribution of non-HDL and LDL cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk prediction among individuals with and without diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care,2005, 28 : 1916-1921.
  • 10Ridker PM, Rifai N, Cook NR, et al. Non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoproteins A-I and B100, standard lipid measures, lipid ratios, and CRP as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women[ J]. JAMA, 2005, 294:326-333.

同被引文献21

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部