期刊文献+

基于柔度曲率矩阵差的损伤结构识别方法 被引量:4

Identification method for damage structure based on difference of flexibility curvature matrix
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了提高柔度法应用于结构损伤识别的范围和准确度,提出了一种柔度曲率矩阵差的损伤识别新指标,并在柔度法理论基础上进行了改进.通过简支梁和连续梁的算例对这种识别指标的有效性进行了验证,同时采用了另外3种识别指标进行了对比.结果表明:在单处损伤和多处损伤的情况下,使用该指标仅需前一阶模态数据就能对文中梁结构进行准确的损伤定位,并对结构轻微的损伤进行了准确识别.与文中的另外3种损伤指标相比,新指标具有明显的优势,且更具准确性和广泛性. In order to enhance the extent and precision of flexibility method applied to damage identification of structures,a new index for damage identification based on difference of flexibility curvature matrix was proposed,and was improved on the basis of flexibility theory.The availability of the identification index was verified with the calculating examples of both simple beam and continuous beam.Meanwhile,the other three identification indexes were adopted for comparison.The results show that under single damage and multiple damage conditions,only the former first mode data are needed to obtain the accurate damage location of the beam structures by using the proposed index.In addition,the precise identification for the slight damage of structures was carried out.Compared with the other three indexes,the new index has obvious superiority,precision and universality.
作者 徐典 杨佑发
出处 《沈阳工业大学学报》 EI CAS 北大核心 2012年第6期715-720,共6页 Journal of Shenyang University of Technology
基金 重庆市科技攻关计划项目(2009AB0040)
关键词 柔度 损伤识别 简支梁 连续梁 柔度曲率 柔度曲率矩阵差 一阶模态 轻微损伤 flexibility damage identification simple beam continuous beam flexibility curvature difference of flexibility curvature matrix first mode slight damage
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈建林,郭杏林.基于神经网络的简支梁损伤检测研究[J].烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版),2001,14(3):217-223. 被引量:19
  • 2黄振平 杨学山.桥梁挠度的新仪器--QY倾角仪.结构强度、振动、测试、理论与应用学术会议论文集[M].,1992.191-197.
  • 3杨山 马树林 等..新型桥梁静、动挠度测量系统的实验及结果分析[M].中国地震局工程力学研究所,2001,11..
  • 4RAGHAVENDRACHAR M, AKTAN A E. Flexibility by multireference impact testing for bridge diagnostics[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1992, 118(8): 2186-2203.
  • 5PANDEY A K, BISWAS M. Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1994, 169(1): 3-17.
  • 6AKTAN A E, LEE K L, CHUNTAVAN C, et al. Modal testing for structural identification and condition assessment of constructed facilities[C]//Proc, of 12th International Modal Analysis Conference. Honolulu, [s. n. ], 1994: 462-468.
  • 7DOEBLING S W, FARRAR C R. Computation of structural flexibility for bridge health monitoring using ambient modal data [C]//Engineering Mechanics: Proceedings of 11th Conference, New York, Columbia University, 1996, 2: 1114-1116.
  • 8ZHAO J, DE WOLF J T. Sensitivity study for vibrational parameters used in damage detection [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1999, 125(4): 410-416.
  • 9CAWLEY P, ADAMS R D. The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies[J]. Journal of Strain Analysis, 1979, 14(2) : 49-57.
  • 10Lieven N A, Ewins D J. Spatial correlation of mode shapes,the co-ordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC)[A].In: Proceedings of the 6^th International Modal Analysis Conference 1[C].NewYork: Union College Schenectady,NY12308, Society for experiment mechanics, INC, 1988.690 - 695.

共引文献250

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部