期刊文献+

国产、进口生长抑素治疗急性胰腺炎的成本-效果分析 被引量:1

Cost-effectiveness analysis of domestic and import somatostatin in the treatment of acute pancreatitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较国产、进口生长抑素治疗急性胰腺炎的成本-效果比。方法将患者分为两组,A组用国产生长抑素治疗+基础治疗;B组用进口生长抑素治疗+基础治疗。应用药物经济学的成本-效果分析方法,对两组治疗急性胰腺炎的疗效及成本进行评价。结果 1个疗程结束时,国产生长抑素和进口生长抑素的疗效无显著差异(P>0.05),有效率分别为85.71%和89.47%,两组腹痛缓解时间、血淀粉酶恢复时间和血白细胞恢复时间差异不明显;A组成本显著低于B组(P<0.05),成本-效果比分别为1 066.16和2 901.98,相差1 835.82。两组的不良反应较少且无明显差异。结论应用国产生长抑素治疗急性胰腺炎价格相对低廉,成本-效果比优于进口生长抑素。 Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio of domestic somatostatin and import somatostatin for acute pancreatitis.Methods Two therapeutic regimens for acute pancreatitis were compared by a cost-effectiveness analysis.These regimens were composed of domestic somatostatin+basal therapy(group A);import somatostatin+basal therapy(group B).Results The effective rates of the domestic somatostatin and the import somatostatin after completion of the treatment course were similar(85.71% vs 89.47%,P 0.05);the time of abdominal pain alleviation and recovery time of serum amylase,white blood cell were not obviously different;the cost of group A was significantly lower than group B(P 0.05),the cost-effectiveness ratios were 1 066.16 and 2 901.98 respectively.There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse reactions.Conclusion Domestic somatostatin is cheaper yet with higher cost-effective ratio as compared with the import somatostatin.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2012年第33期123-124,127,共3页 China Medical Herald
基金 江苏省无锡市药师协会--常州四药临床药学科研基金(项目编号:CSZ00N1139)
关键词 生长抑素 急性胰腺炎 成本-效果分析 Somatostatin Acute pancreatitis Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献79

  • 1刘占举,牛虹,柯楠.英国急性胰腺炎诊治指南[J].医学与哲学,2005,26(10X):64-66. 被引量:35
  • 2彭蕻琳,罗育新,陈小可.头孢呋辛序贯疗法治疗下呼吸道感染38例[J].中国药业,2006,15(10):53-54. 被引量:2
  • 3施敦,邹寿椿,裘华森,姜蔚,张静霞.施他宁治疗急性胰腺炎的疗效观察[J].中国急救医学,1997,17(2):28-29. 被引量:11
  • 4[1]Toouli J,Brooke-Smith M,Bassi C,Carr-Locke D,Telford J,Freeny P,Imrie C,Tandon R.Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis.J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17 Suppl:S15-S39
  • 5[2]Mayumi T,Ura H,Arata S,Kitamura N,Kiriyama I,Shibuya K,Sekimoto M,Nago N,Hirota M,Yoshida M,Ito Y,Hirata K,Takada T.Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acute pancreatitis:proposals.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002; 9:413-422
  • 6[3]UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis.Gut 2005; 54 Supp1 3:iii1-iii9
  • 7[4]Pancreatic Disease Group,Chinese Society of Gastroenterology & Chinese Medical Association.Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis.Chin J Dig Dis 2005; 6:47-51
  • 8[5]Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine,the Japan Pancreas Society,the Research Committee of Intractable Diseases of the Pancreas.:Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for acute pancreatitis.Tokyo:Kanehara,2003
  • 9[6]Otsuki M,Mayumi T,Arata S,Ito T,Inui K,Kataoka K,Kamisawa T,Kawa S,Kitagawa M,Kuroda Y,Koizumi M,Saisho H,Sawabu N,Simosegawa T,Takeda K,Takeyama Y,Tanaka S,Hirota M.Consensus of primary care in acute pancreatitis.Arcmedia Tokyo 2005 (In Japanese)
  • 10[7]Steinberg W,Tenner S.Acute pancreatitis.N Engl J Med 1994;330:1198-1210

共引文献24

同被引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部