期刊文献+

Improving power system dynamic performance using attuned design of dual-input PSS and UPFC PSD controller

Improving power system dynamic performance using attuned design of dual-input PSS and UPFC PSD controller
原文传递
导出
摘要 The objective of this work is the coordinated design of controllers that can enhance damping of power system swings. With presence of flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) device as unified power flow controller (UPFC), three specific classes of the power system stabilizers (PSSs) have been investigated. The first one is a conventional power system stabilizer (CPSS); the second one is a dual-input power system stabilizer (dual-input PSS); and the third one is an accelerating power PSS model (PSS2B). Dual-input PSS and PSS2B are introduced to maintain the robustness of control performance in a wide range of swing frequency. Uncoordinated PSS and UPFC damping controller may cause unwanted interactions; therefore, the simultaneous coordinated tuning of the controller parameters is needed. The problem of coordi- nated design is formulated as an optimization problem, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is employed to search for optimal parameters of controllers. Finally, in a system having a UPFC, comparative analysis of the results obtained from application of the dual-input PSS, PSS2B, and CPSS is presented. The eigenvalue analysis and the time-domain simulation results show that the dual-input PSS & UPFC and the PSS2B & UPFC coordination provide a better performance than the conventional single-input PSS & UPFC coordination. Also, the PSS2B & UPFC coordination has the best performance. The objective of this work is the coordinated design of controllers that can enhance damping of power system swings. With presence of flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) device as unified power flow controller (UPFC), three specific classes of the power system stabilizers (PSSs) have been investigated. The first one is a conventional power system stabilizer (CPSS); the second one is a dual-input power system stabilizer (dual-input PSS); and the third one is an accelerating power PSS model (PSS2B). Dual-input PSS and PSS2B are introduced to maintain the robustness of control performance in a wide range of swing frequency. Uncoordinated PSS and UPFC damping controller may cause unwanted interactions; therefore, the simultaneous coordinated tuning of the controller parameters is needed. The problem of coordi- nated design is formulated as an optimization problem, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is employed to search for optimal parameters of controllers. Finally, in a system having a UPFC, comparative analysis of the results obtained from application of the dual-input PSS, PSS2B, and CPSS is presented. The eigenvalue analysis and the time-domain simulation results show that the dual-input PSS & UPFC and the PSS2B & UPFC coordination provide a better performance than the conventional single-input PSS & UPFC coordination. Also, the PSS2B & UPFC coordination has the best performance.
出处 《Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China》 CSCD 2012年第4期416-426,共11页 中国电气与电子工程前沿(英文版)
关键词 simultaneous coordinated design unifiedpower flow controller (UPFC) power swing damping(PSD) dual-input power system stabilizer simultaneous coordinated design, unifiedpower flow controller (UPFC), power swing damping(PSD), dual-input power system stabilizer
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献58

  • 1Kazemi, A., Ladjevardi, M., Masoum, M.A.S., 2005. Optimal selection of SSSC based damping stabilizer parameters for improving power system dynamic stability using genetic algorithm, Ir. J. Sci Technol. Trans. B Eng., 29(B1): 1-10.
  • 2Liu, S., 2006. Assessing Placement of Controller and Nonlinear Behavior of Electrical Power System Using Normal Form Information. PhD Thesis, Iowa State University, USA, p.128-133.
  • 3Noroozian, M., Ghandhari, M., Andersson, G., Gronquist, J., Hiskens, I.A., 2001. A robust control strategy for shunt and series reactive compensators to damp electromechanical oscillations. IEEE Trans. Power Del., 16(4): 812-817. [doi: 10.1109/61.956774].
  • 4Pourbeik, E, Gibbard, M.J., 1996. Damping and synchronizing torques induced on generators by FACTS stabilizers in multimachine power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 11(4):1920-1925. [doi: 10.1109/59.544664].
  • 5Pourbeik, P., Gibbard, M.J., 1998. Simultaneous coordination of power system stabilizers and FACTS device stabilizers in a multimachine power system for enhancing dynamic performance. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 13(2):473-479. [doi:10.1109/59.667371].
  • 6Sauer, R, Pai, M., 1998. Power System Dynamics and Stability. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, p.123-159.
  • 7Vittal, V., 1992. Transient stability test systems for direct stability methods, 1EEE Trans. Power Syst., 7(1):37-44. [doi:10,1109/59.141684].
  • 8Wang, H.F., 1999. Static synchronous series compensator to damp power system oscillation. Electr. Power Syst. Res., 54(8): 113-119. [doh 10.10161S0378-7796(99)00076-0].
  • 9Zanetta, L.C., da Cruz, J.J., 2005. An incremental approach to the coordinated tuning of power system stabilizers using mathematical programming. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 20(2):895-902. [doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2005.846111].
  • 10Anderson, P.M., Fouad, A.A., 1977. Power System Control and Stability. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA, p.233-308.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部