期刊文献+

穿越活动断层埋地管道的应变分析 被引量:3

Strain Analysis of Buried Pipelines Crossing Movable Fault
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文中系统回顾了穿越活动断层埋地管道研究的历程,并分析比较了各种方法的特点、适用范围与不足,通过采用Newmark-Hall法和Kennedy法对管道应变进行了计算,并分析了不同参数对管道应变的影响程度,考虑埋地管道安全性以及建设的经济性,建议埋地管道敷设时以50°~80°穿越断层、管道埋深控制在1 m以内,最后针对当前的研究现状,提出对今后穿越活动断层埋地管道研究的建议和看法。 This paper makes a strain-based analysis of oil and gas pipelines crossing a movable fault.First,it systematically introduces diverse methods of the oil and gas pipelines across the movable fault and compares these methods,and then tells the scope and shortcomings.Second,it applies Newmark-Hall Method and Kennedy Method to calculate pipeline strain.Then,it discusses the impact of several parameters on the pipeline strain.Taking economical and safe factors into accout,it is optimal to lay pipes crossing the movable fault at an angle of 50°~80° and control pipe the depth within 1 m.In the end,the paper provides personal views on future oil and gas pipelines crossing the movable fault.
作者 张鑫 黄晓靓
出处 《管道技术与设备》 CAS 2012年第6期10-12,17,共4页 Pipeline Technique and Equipment
关键词 埋地管道 断层穿越 应变分析 抗震措施 buried pipelines movable fault crossing strain analysis seismic measures
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1GB50470--2008油气输送管道线路工程抗震技术规范.
  • 2刘爱文.基于壳模型的埋地管道抗震分析.北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2002.
  • 3蒋录珍,朱庆杰.跨断层地下管道破坏的数值模拟[J].福州大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(z1):321-324. 被引量:7
  • 4冯启民,郭恩栋,宋银美,高惠瑛,张培珍,徐文德.跨断层埋地管道抗震试验[J].地震工程与工程振动,2000,20(1):56-62. 被引量:46
  • 5ASCE (1984). Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems. Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines of ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering.
  • 6KENNEDY R P , CHOW A W, WILLIAMSON R A. Fault Movement Effects on Buried Oil Pipeline. Journal of the Transportation Engineering Division, ASCE, 1977, 103 (TE5) :617 - 633.
  • 7刘学杰,孙绍平.地下管道穿越断层的应变设计方法[J].特种结构,2005,22(2):81-85. 被引量:30

二级参考文献17

  • 1[3]Wang L R L, Wang L J. Parametric study of buried pipeline due to large fault movement[A]. Proceedings of 3irth Trilateral China -Japan- U S Symposium on Lifeline Earthquake Engineeing[C]. 1998. 165- 172.
  • 2[1]Newmark N M. Seismic design criteria for structures and facilities[ A]. Tans- Alaska Pipeline System, Proceedings U S National Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. EERT. 1975.
  • 3[2]Kennedy R P, Cnow A W, Williamson R A. Fault movement effects on buried oil pipeline[J]. J of Transp Engineering, ASCE,1977, 103: 617- 633.
  • 4冯启民,中国地震局工程力学研究所报告,1999年
  • 5冶金工业部建筑研究总院防灾抗震工程研究所,地下管线抗震计算方法与工程应用,1991年
  • 6侯忠良,地下管线抗震,1990年
  • 7胡聿贤,地震工程学,1988年
  • 8O'Rourke M. and Liu X. (1999). Response of Buried Popelines Subject to Earthquake Effects, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. Monograph Series. No. 3
  • 9Kennedy R. , Chow A. and Williamson R. (1997). Fault Movement Effects on Buried Oil Pipeline. Journal of the Transportation Engineering Division. ASCE, Vol. 103,No. TE5, May 1977,pp.617 ~ 633
  • 10Liang, J. (1995). 3-D Seismic Response of Pipeline Laid through Faults. Proceedings of 4th Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, ASCE

共引文献78

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部