期刊文献+

血流储备分数在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗老年冠心病患者中的作用 被引量:12

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血流储备分数(FFR)在经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗老年冠心病患者的临床疗效。方法选取该院2010年2月至2012年4月治疗的68例老年冠心病患者为研究对象,针对两组患者的相关临床指标进行比较分析。结果实验组患者的支架植入数量和造影剂用量均低于对照组患者(均P<0.05);实验组患者30 d心绞痛发生比例为5.88%,低于对照组患者的14.71%(P<0.05)。两组患者均无心脏不良事件发生。结论针对老年冠心病患者,运用FFR在临床上指导PCI治疗,具有重要的临床实践意义。
出处 《中国老年学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第24期5378-5379,共2页 Chinese Journal of Gerontology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献73

  • 1Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions. The Nordic bifurcation study[J].Circulation, 2006, 114(18) :1955 1961.
  • 2Ge L, Iakovou I, Cosgrave J, et al. Treatment of bifurcation lesions with two stents: one year angiographic and clinical follow up of crush versus T stenting[J]. Heart,2006,92(3) : 371-376.
  • 3Chen S, Zhang J, Ye F, et al. DK crush (doublekissing and double-crush) technique for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions: Illustration and comparison with classic crush[J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2007,19(4) : 189-193.
  • 4Kern MJ, SamMy H. Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55 (3) : 173-185.
  • 5Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al, Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2008,52 (8) : 636-643.
  • 6Koo BK. Physiologic evaluation of bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2009 ,22(2): 110- 113.
  • 7Sarno G, Garg S, Onuma Y, et al. Bifurcation lesions: Functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram [J]. Catheter Carcliovasc Interv, 2010,76(6) :817-823.
  • 8Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009,360(3) :213-224.
  • 9Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol , 2010,56(3) :177-184.
  • 10Koo BK, Park KW, Kang HJ, et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve [J]. Eur Heart J,2008 ,29(6) :726-732.

共引文献23

同被引文献131

引证文献12

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部