期刊文献+

超声造影与增强CT对胆囊病变鉴别诊断的对比研究 被引量:16

Comparison of enhancement pattern and differential diagnosis efficacy between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for gallbladder diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胆囊良恶性病变超声造影(CEUS)和增强CT(CECT)表现特征。方法对经手术病理证实的72例胆囊病变患者的术前CEUS和CECT的增强模式和诊断结果进行比较研究。结果①良性病变CEUS和CECT增强早期大部分均呈高增强,分别为84.6%(33/39)和79.5%(31/39)(P。0.500)。恶性病变CEUS和CECT在增强早期亦以高增强为主,分别有97.0%(32/33)和87.9%(29/33)(P=0.250)。良性增强病变晚期CEUS和CECT上呈低增强者分别为91.2%(31/34)和88.2%(30/34)(P=1.000)。恶性病变在CEUS和CECT上增强晚期均消退为低增强者均为100%。②良性和恶性病变CEUS增强减退为低增强的时间分别为(39.9±15.7)S和(29.9±5.6)s(t=3.61,P=0.000)。③良性病变CEUS和CECT病灶呈不均匀增强者分别为41.0%(16/39)和53.8%(21/39)(P=0.063),恶性病变分别为84.8%(28/33)和97.0%(32/33)(P=0.125)。④恶性病变中CEUS和CECT诊断胆囊壁完整性破坏者分别为87.9%(29/33)和90.9%(30/33)(P=1.000)。⑤CEUS和CECT的良恶性诊断准确率分别为91.7%(66/72)和87.5%(63/72),敏感性为97.0%(32/33)和93.9%(31/33),特异性为87.2%(34/39)和82.15%(32/39)(P值分别为0.250、1.000、0.500)。结论良恶性胆囊疾病在CEUS和CEcT增强模式有相当的一致性,两者诊断效能接近。 Objective To compare the enhancement characteristic of the gallbladder diseases and to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy in differential diagnosis of the gallbladder diseases between contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) and contrasvenhanced computed tomography (CECT). Methods Seventy-two patiens with gallbladder lesions were examined by CEUS and CECT before operation and all final diagnoses were confirmed by surgery and/or pathological diagnosis. Results 1)In early phase,84.6% (33/39) and 79.50% (31/39) of benign diseases showed hyper enhancement on CEUS and CECT, and 97.0K (32/33) and 87.9)% (29/33) of malignant diseases showed hyper-enhancement on CEUS and CECT respectively ( P = 0. 250). In later phase,91.2% (31/34) and 88.2%(30/34) of benign diseases showing hypo-enhancement (P = 1.000), and 100% of the malignant diseases showing hypo-enhancement on CEUS and CECT respectively. 2)The time of enhancement from hyper- to hypo in CEUS for benign and malignant diseases were (39.9± 15.7)s and (29.9 ± 5.6)s respeetively (t = 3.61, P = 1.000). 3)The inhomogeneous enhancement on CEUS and CECT were 41.0% (16/39) and 53.80/00 (21/39) in the benign diseases respectively ( P = 0. 063),84.8%(28/33) and 97.0%(32/33) in the malignant diseases respectively( P : 0. 125). 4)The destruction of the gallbladder wall on CEUS and CECT are 87.90//00 (29/33) and 90.90/oo (30/33) respeetivdy( P = l. 000). 5)The accuracy, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity of CEUS and CECTwere 91.7%(66/72) and 87.5%(63/72 ) ,97.0%(32/33) and 93.9%(31/33),87.2%(34/39) and 82.15% (32/39) respectively ( P = 0. 250,1. 000,0. 500). Conclusions The enhancement pattern of the gallbladder diseases on CEUS and CECT were much similar. CEUS has equal diagnostic efficacy in comparison with CECT, but CEUS can supply more diagnostic information than CECT.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期1048-1051,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 广东省医学科研基金(A2010152)
关键词 超声检查 微气泡 胆囊疾病 Ultrasonography Microbubbles Gallbladder diseases
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Anastasi B, Sutherland GR. Biliary sludge-ultrasonic appearance simulating neoplasm. Br J Radiol,1981,54:679 681.
  • 2Kuido T,Kano M, Suzaki S, et al. Large cholesterol polyp of the gallbladder mimicking gallbladder carcinoma. Abdom Imaging, 2004,29:100-101.
  • 3Demachi H, Matsui O, Hoshiba K, et al. Dynamic MRJ using a surface coil in chronic cholecystitis and gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic and histopathologie correlation. J Computer Assist TomoRraph, 1997,21 : 643-651.
  • 4黄娟,宋彬,周翔平,帅丹丹,姚晋.螺旋CT双期扫描对胆囊癌和慢性胆囊炎的鉴别[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2004,11(6):538-541. 被引量:5
  • 5Basilico R, Blomley MJ, Harvey CJ, et al. Which continuous US scanning mode is optimal for the detection of vascularity in liver lesions when enhanced with a second generation contrast agengt? Eur J Radiol,2002,41:184 191.
  • 6Xie XH, Xu HX, Xie XY, et al. Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant gallbladder diseases with real-time contrast- enhanced ultrasound. Eur Radiol,2010,20 : 239-248.
  • 7Meacock LM,Sellars ME,Sidhu PS. Evaluation of gallbladder and biliary duct disease using microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Am .1 Roentgenol, 2010,83 .. 615-627.
  • 8Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Shinozaki K, et al. Helical CT of the local spread of carcinoma of the gallbladder: evaluation according to the TNM system in patients who underwent surgical resection. Am J Roentgenol, 2002,179 : 423-428.
  • 9周琦,姜珏,刘百灵,雷小莹.超声造影在胆囊癌诊断中的应用价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2008,17(5):416-418. 被引量:11

二级参考文献10

  • 1吕明德,谢晓燕,徐作峰,刘广健,郑艳玲,梁瑾瑜.常规超声和超声造影对肝脏局灶性病变定性诊断的有用性评估[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(12):924-926. 被引量:40
  • 2Bleuzen A,Tranquart F. Incidental liver lesions: diagnostic value of cadence contrast pulse sequencing (CPS) and SonoVue. Eur Radiol, 2004,14:53-62.
  • 3Pradhans S, Shukla VK, Agrawal S, et al. Sonographic and colour Doppler morphology in carcinoma gallbladder. Indian J Cancer, 2002,39:143-148.
  • 4Stephen S.Stenberg.诊断外科病理学.第3版.回允中,译.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2003:1629-1670.
  • 5Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Shinozaki K, et al. Helical CT of the local spread of carcinoma of the gallbladder: evaluation according to the TNM system in patients who underwent surgical resection [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002; 179(2): 423
  • 6Yun EJ, Cho SG, Park S, et al. Gallbladder carcinoma and chronic cholecystitis: differentiation with two-phase spiral CT [J]. Abdom Imaging, 2004; 29(1): 102
  • 7Kim YH. Carcinoma of the gallbladder associated with clonorchiasis: clinicopathologic and CT evaluation [J]. Abdom Imaging, 2003; 28(1): 83
  • 8Levy AD, Murakata LA, Rohrmann CA Jr. Gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation [J]. Radiographics, 2001; 21(2): 295
  • 9Kumaran V, Gulati S, Paul B, et al. The role of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability of carcinoma of the gallbladder [J]. Eur Radil, 2002; 12(8): 1993
  • 10陈敏华,严昆.新型造影剂与灰阶超声造影技术对肝肿瘤的诊断价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2004,13(1):38-42. 被引量:157

共引文献14

同被引文献117

引证文献16

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部