1Bourgain C,Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2003,9(6) :515-522.
2Fauser BC, Devroey P. Reproductive biology and IVF:o- varian stimulation and luteal phase consequences [ J ]. Trends Endoerinol Metab, 2003,14 (5) :236-242.
3Horcajadas JA, Riesewijk A, Polman J, et al. Effect of con- trolled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF on endometrial gene expression profiles [ J ]. Mol Hum Reprod, 2005,11 ( 3 ) : 195-205.
4Deehaud H, Bessueille E, Bousquet PJ, et al. Optimal tim- ing of ultrasonographie and Doppler evaluation of uterine receptivity to implantation [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2008.16(3) :368-375.
6Kehila M, Kebaili S, Bougmiza I, et al. Endometrial thick- ness in in vitro fertilization : A study of 414 cases [ J ]. Tu- nis Med,2010,88(12) :928-932.
7A1-Ghamdi A, Coskun S, A1-Hassan S, et al. The correla- tion between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome [ J ]. Reprod Biol Endocrino1,2008 ,6 :37.
8Kumbak B, Erden HF, Tosun S, et al. Outcome of assisted reproduction treatment in patients with endometrial thick- ness less than 7mm [ J ]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2008,18 ( 1 ) :79-84.
7Isaacs JD Jr, Wells CS, Williams DB, et al. Endometrial thickness is a valid monitoring parameter in cycles of ovulation induction with menotropins alone [ J ]. Fertil Steril, 1996,65:262-266
8Jarvela IY, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, et al. Evaluation of endometrial receptivity during in-vitro fertilization using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco1,2005 ,26 :765-769
9Chan CC, Ng EH, Tang OS, et al.Endometrial, subendometrial, and ovarian stromal blood flow in patients treated with two different doses of recombinant human ehorionie gonadotropin [ J]. Fertil Steril,2006,85:520-522
10Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al. Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity is higher in pregnant patients with livebirth following ART than in those who suffer a miscarriage[ J]. Hum Reprod ,2007,22 : 1134-1141
