期刊文献+

“范畴”与“概念”之辩:一个认知问题的探讨 被引量:1

Exploring the Distinction between "Category" and "Concept": A Cognitive Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为认知研究的工具,西方经典哲学中的"范畴"和"概念"体现了哲学家们探索世界、语言、心智的视角和方法,相对容易把握;现代认知科学中的"范畴"和"概念"既反映了学者们的各自取向,也掺杂着研究中的思维混乱,情况非常复杂。从认知本身的多个维度,在同一平面内对"范畴"和"概念"进行考察是个新的思路,也呈现出了一幅较为清晰的图景。 As a pair of cognitive research tools, "category" and "concept" are relatively easy to handle as are found in Western philosophical classics, reflecting various perspectives from which the philosophers come to grip with problems of ontology, language and mind. Yet the opposite is the case when it comes to modern cognitive sciences. For in the latter field far more adventures and approaches have appeared, and some explorers are even confused by available choices that see no sign of ceasing to multiply. A much clearer scene has occurred when the two concepts involved are compared, on the same plane, along different dimensions of cognition itself.
作者 石玮
出处 《景德镇高专学报》 2012年第6期5-9,26,共6页 Jingdezhen Comprehensive College Journal
基金 2009年江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目研究成果之一(项目编号为:YY0917)
关键词 “范畴” “概念” 认知 "category" "concept" cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Ackrill, J. L. Aristotle's Categories and De lnterpretatione Cat- egories[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.
  • 2Cart, B. Metaphysics: An Introduction[M]. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, 1987.
  • 3Davidsson, P. Autonomous Agents and the Concept of Con- cepts[D]. Lund: Lund University, 1996.
  • 4Frege, G. On Concept and Object[A]. In P. Geach & M. Black (ed.). Translations from Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (2nd ed.)[C]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960.
  • 5Hauser, M. Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think [M]. London: Allen Lane Press, 2000.
  • 6Husserl, E. (Translated by W. R.. Boyce-Gibson). Ideas: Gen- eral Introduction to Pure Phenomenology[M]. New York: Collier Books, 1962.
  • 7Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Cate- gories Reveal about the Mind [M]. Chicago/London: The Uni- versity of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 8Mandler, J. M. Development of Categorization: Perceptual and Conceptual Categories[A]. In G. Bremner, A. Slater & G. Butter- worth (ed.). Infant Development: Recent Advances[C]. East Sus- sex, UK: Erlbaum / Psychol. Press, 1997.
  • 9Margolis, E. & Laurence S. Concepts and Cognitive Science [A]. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (ed.). Concepts: Core Readings [C]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1999.
  • 10Margolis, E. & Laurence S. Concepts[EB/OL]. In E. N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), 2006. [2010-1-10]. http: //plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/concepts/.

二级参考文献54

  • 1崔延强.关于亚里士多德所理解的“范畴”一词考释[J].江淮论坛,1993(1):26-28. 被引量:4
  • 2吴世雄,陈维振.论语义范畴的家族相似性[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(4):14-19. 被引量:73
  • 3周雪光.方法·思想·社会科学研究[J].读书,2001(7):32-39. 被引量:16
  • 4张颖清.生物全息律[J].潜科学,1980,(2):50-50.
  • 5维特根斯坦 李步楼译.哲学研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.31、7.
  • 6Labov, W The Boundaries of Word and Their Meanings[A]. Bailey & Shuy. New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English[C]. Washington:Georgetown University Press, 1973.
  • 7Rosch, E Cognitive Representation of Semantic.Categories[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology,1975, (4).
  • 8Rosch, Eleanor & Barbara B Lloyd. Cognition and Categorization[C]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1978.
  • 9Lakoff, George. Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M] Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 10Wittgenstein, L Philosophical Investigation[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953.

共引文献280

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部