摘要
分析人大《复印报刊资料》2008-2011年间对中国高校人文社科学报转载论文数据,发现存在着刊群水平分化、优质学报区域分布不均、211工程与非211工程高校学报水平差距拉大等不均衡发展状况,说明高校学报优胜劣汰的竞争环境已经形成。但是,学报质量与数量并不直接构成一对矛盾,综合性或专业性不是学报改革发展的唯一路径。
This paper analyzes quantitative data of papers which were originally published by Chinese Univer- sity Journals on humanities and social sciences, and reprinted by "Replicated Journals of Renmin University of Chi- na" from 2008 - 2011. It is found that this group of University Journals is in different levels, regional distribution of good journals is unbalanced, and gap between "National 211 Project University" Journals and "Non- national 211 Project University" ones is enlarged, etc. which mean the competitive environment for University Journals' "surviv- al of the fittest" emerges. However, the quantity and the quality of University Journals don' t directly lead to a con- tradiction; neither "to be diverse" nor "focus on a specific area" is the only reformational approach for University Journals to seek further development.
出处
《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第6期73-78,共6页
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金
中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目"2000-2009年间我国211高校人文社科学报学术水平提升评估研究"(10XNE042)
关键词
高校学报
不均衡发展
改革路径
university journals
unbalanced development
reformational approach