期刊文献+

高管过度自信、政治联结与并购绩效——基于中国民营上市公司的实证研究 被引量:3

Top managers' overconfidence,political connections and acquisition performance:evidence from the private companies in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信息不充分时,过度自信的高管往往因高估自身能力而导致较差的并购绩效.增加高管信息是减少此种不良并购绩效的关键,政治联结也因增加高管信息而有利于并购绩效.当过度自信的高管具有政治联结时,其获取信息增多,从而改善了不良的并购绩效.基于深沪两市民营上市公司2004~2007年间发生的411起并购数据,使用事件研究方法、多元回归方法和方差图分析方法,研究发现:(1)高管过度自信对并购绩效有显著的负向影响,支持了自大理论;(2)高管政治联结并非直接、正向地影响并购绩效,而是通过削弱高管过度自信对并购绩效的负面影响来发挥作用.这一发现不仅表明了高管政治联结的新"用途",也表明了自大理论适用的一个新的"边界条件". When information is not sufficient,overconfidence's top managers often overestimate their ability to executive poor performance acquisitions.Increaseing top managers' information is the key of reducing such bad acquisition performance.Political connections which can increase top managers' information are good for acquisition performance.The bad acquisition performance could be improved,when the overconfidence's top managers have political connections which could give them more information.Based on the 411 events of acquisition of the private listed companies' from 2004 to 2007 in china,the paper uses the methods of event analysis,multi-regression and variance analysis table,and finds that:(1)top managers' overconfidence is significantly negative influence on acquisition performance,which supports the theory of hubris;(2)top mangers' political connection is not directly positive influence on acquisition performance,but is indirect influence on acquisition performance by top managers' overconfidence.The results not only indicate the new value of top managers' political connection,but also state clearly the boundary conditions of the theory of hubris.
作者 卢昌崇 马超
出处 《辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2012年第4期549-556,共8页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71002093)
关键词 过度自信 政治联结 并购绩效 overconfidence political connections acquisition performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献196

共引文献3436

同被引文献48

  • 1胡旭阳.民营企业家的政治身份与民营企业的融资便利——以浙江省民营百强企业为例[J].管理世界,2006,22(5):107-113. 被引量:504
  • 2余明桂,夏新平,邹振松.管理者过度自信与企业激进负债行为[J].管理世界,2006,22(8):104-112. 被引量:410
  • 3李寿喜.产权、代理成本和代理效率[J].经济研究,2007,42(1):102-113. 被引量:410
  • 4Andrade K,Mitchell G M, Stafford E. New evidence and perspectives on mergers [ J ]. Journal of Economic Perspectives ,2001,15 ( 2 ) : 103 - 120.
  • 5Khwaja A,Mian A. Do lenders favor politically con- nected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market [ J ]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005, 120(2) :1371 - 1411.
  • 6Faccio M. Politically-connected firms :can they squeeze the state? [ J ]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2003,96(3) :369 -386.
  • 7Johnson S, Mitton T. Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia [ J ]. Journal of Financial Eco- nomics,2003,67 ( 2 ) : 351 - 382.
  • 8Cull R, Xu L. Institutions, ownership and finance: the determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005,77 (1) :117 -146.
  • 9Chancy P K,Faccio M, Parsley D. The quality of ac- counting information in politically connected firms IJ]. SRN Electronic Journal,2006,51 ( 1 ) :58 -76.
  • 10Faccio M, Ronald W M, John J M. Political connec- tions and corporate bailouts [ J ]. The Journal of Fi- nance,2006 (6) :2597 - 2635.

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部