摘要
目的比较PFNA和DHS治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析124例股骨粗隆间骨折患者(DHS组65例,PFNA组59例)资料,从失血量和术后4个时间点Harris功能评分进行比较。结果 PFNA组患者的失血量及术后1个月的Harris评分均显著优于DHS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折与DHS相比更具优势。
Objective To compare the effects of DHS and PFNA in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Methods The data of 124 cases with pertrochanteric fractures（DHS group,65 cases;PFNA group,59 cases） was retrospectively analyzed on blood loss and Harris function scores at postoperative 4 time-points.Results PFNA was superior to DHS in blood loss and Harris scores at one month postoperatively（P〈0.05）.Conclusion PFNA was superior to DHS in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures.
出处
《中国实用医药》
2012年第33期30-31,共2页
China Practical Medicine
