期刊文献+

大学人才培养定位的历史演化与现实选择

Historical Evolution and Realistic Choice of University Talent Training
原文传递
导出
摘要 大学是一个以人才培养为重任的场所。大学人才培养目标正在从"精英"向"精英与大众并存"转化。无论哪一种人才培养方式,只要尊重教育规律与时代要求都会取得成功。当前我国的大学在人才培养定位方面存在着混乱现象。其原因一是和我国高等教育的发展阶段相关,二是与大学对自身社会责任的认识不清晰相关。大众化背景下我国大学在人才培养策略选择上有着与政府、社会等利益博弈关系。 The university is a place to taking the talent cultivation as the task. The talent training goal of univer- sity is from "the elite" to "the coexistence of the elite and the mass conversion". No matter which kind of train- ing talent mode will be succeed as long as we respect the laws of education and the requirements of the times. At present, the phenomenon of confusion and confused exists in talent cultivation orientation in our country univer- sity. One of the reasons is regarding to the current situation and development stage of China's higher education, the other reason related with their social responsibility awareness of the university itself is not clearly. Under the background of popularization, the universities of our country have the interest^s game relation with the gov- ernment and society in the talent training strategies.
作者 范乾坤
出处 《煤炭高等教育》 2012年第6期21-23,共3页 Meitan Higher Education
关键词 人才培养 定位 历史 现状 博弈 talent training orientation history present situation strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1McCormick, Alexander C, ed. (2001). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2000 Edition. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2001 :p.Ⅶ, 1,5,14.
  • 2John R. (2004). Thelin, A History of American Higher Education, The John Hopkins University Press, Chapter 7,265, 317, 279.
  • 3Thomas D. ( 1993 ). Snyder. 120 Years of American Education : A Statistical Portrait, National Center for Education Statistics, 65.
  • 4Trow Martin, (2005). Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWⅡ, Philip Altbach, ed. , International Handbook of Higher Education, Kluwer. pp. 4-5.
  • 5Harold L. (1974). Enarson "Book review for the Priorities for Action: Final Report of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education", The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 45(Apr.) pp. 311-312.
  • 6Clark Kerr. ( 1991 ). The Great Transformation in Higher Education 1960 - 1980, State University of New York Press, Prologue.
  • 7Burton R. Clark. Delineating the Character of the Entrepreneurial University.Higher Education Policy. 17. p. 366.
  • 8Clark Kerr. ( 1991 ). "Functions-the pluralistic university in the pluralistic society", The Great Transformation in Higher Education 1960 - 1980, State University of New York Press, p. 47.
  • 9The Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education, 1980. p. 199.
  • 10McCormick, Alexander C. (2005). Zhao, Chun-Mei: Rethinking and Reframing the Carnegie Classification, Change. No. 5 : pp. 50-57.

共引文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部