期刊文献+

瑞替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死的有效性与安全性临床分析 被引量:3

Efficacy and safety of reteplase as therapy in the patients with acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨瑞替普酶(reteplase,rPA)静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死(acutemyocardialinfarction,AMI)的疗效及安全性。方法选择74例发病〈12h的AMI患者作为观察组,采用rPA进行静脉溶栓,并回顾性分析138例应用阿替普酶(rt-PA)治疗的AMI患者作为对照。研究溶栓再通率、急性期病死率、不良事件发生率。结果观察组溶栓再通率高于rt—PA组(P〈0.05);急性期病死率两者比较,差异无统计学差异(p〉0.05);观察组出血并发症略高于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论rPA静脉溶栓治疗血管再通率高、安全、副作用少,并且给药方便。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rPA for intravenous thrombolysis therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods 74 Patients were treated with intravenous rPA, a retrospective analysis of 138 patients treated by intravenous rt-PA was as control group. Then the clinical repatency rate, acute phase mortality, complications, aqkverse event incidence were observed. Results Thrombolytic recanalization rate of rPA group was higher than that of rt-PA (P〈0.05), there was no statistically significant difference in acute mortality, while hemorrhage in rPA groups was slightly higher than that in rt-PA group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The rPA has higher repatency rate, higher safety, fewer side effects, and convenient administration.
出处 《中国实用乡村医生杂志》 2012年第24期37-39,共3页 Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor
关键词 瑞替普酶 急性心肌梗死 reteplase acute myocardial infarction
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1胡大一.急性心肌梗塞链激酶静脉溶栓疗法的多中心试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,1994,22(6):403-405. 被引量:60
  • 2ResearchGroupofNationalProject85-915-02-01(Correspondence:FuWaiHospi-tal,CAMS&PUMC,Beijing100037).急性心肌梗塞尿激酶临床应用研究(1138例)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(3):169-173. 被引量:156
  • 3Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol.2004, 44:671- 719.
  • 4Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2003,24:28-66.
  • 5McNamara RL, Herrin J, Bradley EH, et al. Hospital improvement in time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1999 - 2002. J Am Coil Cardiol,2005 ,47 :45-51.
  • 6Berger AK, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM, et al. Factors associated with delay in reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: analysis of the cooperative cardiovascular project. Am Heart J,2000,139:985-992.
  • 7Zahn R, Schiele R, Seidl K, et al. Maximal Individual Therapy in Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group. Daytime and nighttime differences in patterns of performance of primary angioplasty in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J, 1999,138(6 part 1 ) :1111-1117.
  • 8De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, et al. Circadian variation in myocardial perfusion and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. Am Heart J, 2005,150 : 1185-1189.
  • 9David J, Yongfei Wang, Jeph Herrin, et al. Relationship Between Time of Day, Day of Week, Timeliness of Reperfusion, and In-Hospital Mortality for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. JAMA, 2005,294 : 803-812.
  • 10Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, et al. Door-to-drug and door-to-balloon times: where can we improve? Time to reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Am Heart J,2006,151:1281-1287.

共引文献2124

同被引文献51

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部