期刊文献+

北京友谊医院建院60年科技影响力分析

Scientific and Technological Influence of Beijing Friendship Hospital in the Past 60 Years Since Its Establishment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过回顾60年科研活动,解读北京友谊医院科学研究、学科建设和人才培养状况,为医院的全面建设提供参考。方法运用文献计量学研究方法对北京友谊医院建院60年来发表的期刊论文的期刊和作者进行统计分析。结果共发表论文10 049篇,署有作者姓名的论文9 901篇;论文分布在791种期刊上,共有作者2 566名;刊登论文最多的期刊为560篇,发表论文最多的作者为90篇;作者的H指数和最高为15。结论北京友谊医院发表论文数量呈稳步上升阶段,具有较强的科研实力和科技影响力,建成了比较完善的医教研学科体系,构建了结构合理的人才队伍机制,但发表论文的数量和质量仍有待提高。 Objective To investigate the scientific research,subject construction and talent training in Beijing Friendship Hospital by reviewing its scientific research activities in the past 60 years since its establishment in order to provide reference for its overall construction.Methods Papers published by Beijing Friendship Hospital in the past 60 years,as well as the journals and authors that published them were analyzed by bibliometry.Results A total of 10 049 papers were published by Beijing Friendship Hospital in the past 60 years with 9 901 signed by authors.These papers were published in 791 journals.The total number of authors was 2 566.The largest number of papers were published in Clinical and Experimental Medical Journal,accounting for 560.Professor Na Kai-xian published the largest number of papers,accounting for 90 papers,and the H index of professor Jia ji-dong was 15.Conclusion The number of papers published by Beijing Friendship Hospital increases stably and shows a stronger scientific research ability and influence.Beijing Friendship Hospital has established a rather perfect scientific system for medical treatment,teaching and research,and a talent team with a rational structure.However,the number and academic level of papers it published need to be improved.
出处 《预防医学情报杂志》 CAS 2012年第12期1005-1010,共6页 Journal of Preventive Medicine Information
关键词 医学科研论文 计量分析 绩效评价 北京友谊医院 medical paper bibliometric analysis performance assessment Beijing Friendship Hospital
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献28

  • 1秦长江.SCI、EI收录河南省三所高校科技论文的期刊源分析[J].现代情报,2005,25(8):35-37. 被引量:7
  • 2金碧辉.科学家为自己设计了一项评价指标:h指数[J].科学观察,2006,1(1):8-9. 被引量:71
  • 3陈文爱,杨璐,赵瑞刚.简析科研产出的文献计量学评价方法[J].图书馆工作与研究,2007(4):73-74. 被引量:14
  • 4南京大学中国社会科学研究评价中心.中文社会科学引文索引.http://cssci.nju.edu.cn/cssci_qk.htm.
  • 5Hirsch, J. E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102 (46) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 6Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists, Nature 436 ( 18 Aug 2005 ) 900.
  • 7Roediger H. L. ,The h Index in Science:A New Measure of Scholarly Contribution, APS Observer, 2006, 19,4, [ 2007- 04-12]. http://www. psychologicalscience. org/observer/ getArticle. cfm? id = 1971.
  • 8Moed H.F. Hirsch Index Is a Creative and Appealing Construct but be Cautious When Using It to Evaluate Individual Scholars. [ 2007-3-21 ]. http://www. cwst. nl /hm/Comments_on_Hirsch_Index_2005_12_16. pdf.
  • 9Cronin B, Meho L. Using the h-Index to Rank Influential Information Scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57 (9) : 1275 - 1278.
  • 10Oppenheim C. Using the h-Index to Rank Influential British Researchers in Information Science and Librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(2) : 297 -301.

共引文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部