期刊文献+

应用微型钢板与交叉克氏针融合手指近指间关节的疗效对比 被引量:4

Comparative study of clinical outcome of proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis fixed by mini-plates and cross K-wires
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用微型铜板螺钉与交叉克氏针融合手指近指间关节的手术疗效。方法对53例79指近指间关节内骨折、骨缺损患者,分别采用微型钢板螺钉和交叉克氏针固定进行关节融合,其中A组30例47指行微型钢板螺钉固定,B组23例32指行交叉克氏针固定。术后分别对并发症、骨愈合情况以及功能恢复进行比较。功能恢复情况按照TAM功能评定标准进行比较。结果术后随访4~24个月,平均11个月。A组无感染及皮肤坏死,无延迟愈合、骨不连及旋转畸形。融合关节临床愈合时间为6~8周,平均7.3周,X片示骨性愈合时间为8~9周;B组针道感染3指,旋转畸形3指.延迟愈合4指,无骨不连。融合关节,临床愈合时间为7~15周,平均11.2周。X片示骨性愈合时间为10~16周。优良率A组为90.7%,B组为67.1%。术后并发症:A组在邻近关节僵硬、局部不适及肌腱粘连等方面均低于B组。结论微型铜板固定近指间关节融合明显优于交叉克氏针固定。 Objective To compare of the effect of hand function recovery of proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis fixed by mini-plates and cross K-wires. Methods Totally 53 cases, 79 fingers, with intra-articular fracture and bone defects on proximal interphalangeal joint were included in the study. In Group A, 30 cases, 47 fingers, were fixed by mini titanium plate. In Group B, 23 cases, 32 fingers, were fixed by cross K-wires. Postoperative complications, bone healing status and finger function were assessed. The clinical results were evaluated by using the Total Active Motion (TAM) criterion of the finger movement. Results All the patients were followed-up for 4 to 24 months, with an average time of 11 months. In group A, there was no infection, skin necrosis, nonunion or deformed union occurred.Clinical union of the arthrodesis took 6 to 8 weeks, with an average time of 7.3 weeks, while bone union on X- ray was achieved by 8 to 9 weeks. In group B, there was pin tract infection in 3 fingers, rotation deformity in 3 fingers and delayed union in 4 fingers. There was no nonunion occurred. Clinical union of the arthrodesis took 7 to 15 weeks, with an average time of 11.2 weeks, while bone union on X-ray was achieved by 10 to 16 weeks. According to the TAM evaluation criteria, in group A, the overall satisfactory rate was 90.7%, while the rate was 67.1% in Group B. It provided more comfort, less stiffness of adjacent joints and tendon adhesion in group A than that in group B. Conclusion Mini-plates is better fixture of proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis than K-wires.
出处 《实用手外科杂志》 2012年第4期359-361,共3页 Journal of Practical Hand Surgery
关键词 微型铜板 近指间关节 关节融合术 Mini plate Interphalangeal joint Arthrodesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献40

  • 1王天兵,姜保国,傅中国,张殿英,陈建海.AO微型纯钛板钉内固定治疗掌指骨关节内骨折[J].中华手外科杂志,2004,20(2):90-91. 被引量:25
  • 2洪建军,高伟阳,李志杰,陈星隆,厉智,李晓阳.AO微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折[J].中华手外科杂志,2004,20(2):92-93. 被引量:37
  • 3包峻.微型接骨板治疗Bennett's骨折49例体会[J].医学临床研究,2005,22(3):416-417. 被引量:1
  • 4Muller ME 荣国威(译).骨折内固定学,第1版[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.1-48.
  • 5Leibovic SJ, Stricldand JW. Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger: comparison of the use of the Herbert screw with other fixation methods. J Hand Surg( Am), 1994,19 : 181-188.
  • 6Hogh J, Jensen PO. Compression-arthrodesis of finger joints using Kirschner wires and cerclage. Hand, 1982,14:149-152.
  • 7Granowitz S, Vainio K. Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis. A follow-up study of 122 operations. Acta Orthop Scand, 1966,37 : 301-310.
  • 8Kovach JC, Wemer FW, Palmer AK, et al. Biomechanical analysis of internal fixation techniques for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Hand Surg(Am), 1986,11 : 562-566.
  • 9Moberg E. Arthrodesis of finger joints. Surg Clin North (Am), 1960,40:465-470.
  • 10Ijsselstein CB,van Egmond DB,Hovius SE,et al. Results of smalljoint arthrodesis: comparison of Kirschner wire fixation with tension band wire technique. J Hand Surg(Am), 1992,17:952-956.

共引文献4376

同被引文献40

  • 1刘亚东,李汉湘.AO微型钢板螺钉治疗掌指骨骨折[J].湖北医药学院学报,2011,30(5):531-532. 被引量:5
  • 2蔡建国,吴青,赵玉霞.骨膜修复促进骨折愈合的临床应用[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2006,9(10):1089-1090. 被引量:4
  • 3康庆林,曾炳芳.四肢骨不连外科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011.77-78.
  • 4Clinic assessment committee. Total active flexion scale, American society for surgery of the hand report[J].New Orleans:Clinical Assessment Committee, 1976, 35-37.
  • 5Marsh DR, Shah S, Elliott J, et al. The Ilizarov method in nonunion, malunion and infection of fractures[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1997,79:273.
  • 6Shimizu T, Omokawa S, Akahane M, et al. Predictors of the postoperative range of finger motion for comminuted periarticular metacarpal and phalangeal fractures treated with a titanium plate. Injury. 2012;43(6):940-945.
  • 7Kamath JB, Vardhan H, Naik DM, et al. Modified bone tie: a new method to achieve interfragmentary compression in unstable oblique metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012;16(1): 42-44.
  • 8Xu J, Zhang C. Mini-plate versus Kirschner wire internal fixation for treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in Chinese Han population: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9(1 ):24.
  • 9Soni A, Gulati A, Bassi JL, et al. Outcome of closed ipsilatera metacarpal fractures treated with mini fragment plates and screws: a prospective study. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012;13(1 ) 29-33.
  • 10Mohammed R, Farook MZ, Newman K. Percutaneous elastic intramedullary nailing of metacarpal fractures: Surgical technique and clinical results study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011; 6(1):1-5.

引证文献4

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部