理同论殊:试论嵇文甫与侯外庐关于船山思想的两点分歧

Different Approaches to the Same Theory: Two different Views between Ji Wenfu and Hou Wailu on Chuanshan Thoughts

同在马克思主义的研究取向内,嵇文甫和侯外庐的船山学术思想研究有诸多共同点,但也有相异之处。分歧较大者,主要表现在如下两个方面:关于王船山的学术渊源及其与张载的继承关系,嵇文甫强调较多,侯外庐则倾向于作较低的估计;关于王船山思想的阶级属性和时代性,前者持封建地主说,后者则持近代市民启蒙说。这些歧见,可能主要源于二者对船山所处时代整体性质判断的差异,以及从而导致的对史料的选择和解读的不同。

Both oriented by Marxism,Ji Wenfu and Hou Wailu share several common views on Chuanshan academic thoughts,but still there are differences.The greater one lies in two aspects.One is the source of Wang Chuanshang＇s academic thoughts and their relationship with Zhang Zai＇s,which was emphasized by Ji Wenfu but underestimated by Hou Wailu;the other is the class attribute and contemporary characteristics of Wang＇s thoughts,which Ji Wenfu thought as feudalism but Hou Wailu as modern public enlightenment.These differences may be due to their different judgments about the times Wang Chuanshan lived in and the consequent differences in selecting and interpreting the historical documents.