期刊文献+

经第11和12肋骨两种手术入路对L_1爆裂骨折前路手术置钉角度影响的比较研究 被引量:3

Comparison of screw' inserting angle through the 11th and 12th rib anterior approaches for L_1 burst fracture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较经第11肋骨和第12肋骨两种手术入路对L1爆裂骨折前路手术中置钉的角度,探讨两种手术入路对置钉和术后侧方成角的影响。方法:对2007年10月至2010年10月经前路手术治疗资料完整的108例L1椎体爆裂性骨折患者的临床资料进行分析,其中男68例,女40例;年龄21~64岁,平均38.22岁。根据手术入路平面分为经第11肋骨入路组(A组,51例)和经第12肋骨入路组(B组,57例)。观察两组的手术时间、出血量、切口区疼痛持续时间及随访时JOA下腰痛评分、Oswestry功能障碍评分、VAS疼痛评分、生活质量(SF-368个维度)、神经功能恢复情况,测量并比较两组患者的术前、术后及随访时的冠状面Cobb角,术后椎体螺钉与相应终板的夹角。结果:两组患者均获随访,时间9~37个月,平均23个月。A组的手术时间、出血量、切口区疼痛持续时间均较B组少(P<0.05);两组患者的JOA下腰痛评分、Oswestry功能障碍评分、VAS疼痛评分、SF-368个维度、神经功能的恢复差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术前冠状面Cobb角差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而术后Cobb角差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。两种手术入路椎体螺钉与相应终板夹角差异均有统计学意义(P=0.001,P=0.003)。结论:经第11肋骨手术入路对椎体螺钉置钉的影响小,手术创伤较小,术后脊柱侧方成角较轻,是前路手术治疗L1椎体爆裂性骨折相对较好的手术入路选择。 Objective:To compare screw's inserting angle through the 11th and 12th rib in treating L1 burst fracture,explore effects on inserting screw and postoperative angle.Methods:From October 2007 to October 2010,108 patients with L1 brust fracture treated through anterior approach were analyzed,including 68 males and 40 females,aged from 21 to 64 years(mean 38.22 years).All patients were divided into the 11th(A,51 cases) and 12th(B,57 cases) approach.The data of operation time,blood loss,duration of incision pain,JOA score,Oswestry score,VAS score,quality of life(SF-36),recovery of nervous function,coronal Cobb angle,included angle between screw and plate were observed.Results:All patients were followed up for 9 to 37 months,mean 23 months.The operation time,blood loss,duration of incision pain,in group A were lower than group B(P0.05),JOA score,Oswestry score,VAS score,SF-36,recovery of nervous function had no significant differences(P0.05).There were no differences in Cobb angle before operation,but had significance after operation(P=0.000).There were statistically significance between two group in angle between screw and plate(P=0.000,P=0.003).Conclusion:The 11th rib approach for the treatment of L1 burst fracture has less effects on screw,less trauma and less angle between screw and plate.
出处 《中国骨伤》 CAS 2012年第12期1005-1009,共5页 China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
基金 四川省卫生厅科研项目(编号:090318)~~
关键词 腰椎 骨折 外科手术 Lumbar vertebrae Fractures Surgical procedures operative
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Wood KB,Bohn D,Mehbod A. Anterior versus posterior treatment of stable thoracolumbar brust fracture without neurologic defit:a prespective,randomized study[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18 (Suppl 1 ) :S15-$23.
  • 2Fontijne WP,de Klerk LW,Braakman R,et al. CT scan prediction of neurological deficit in thoracolumbar burst fractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1992,74 ( 15 ) : 683-685.
  • 3Ghanayem AJ,Zdeblick TA. Anterior instrumentation in the man- agement of thoracolumbar burst fractures [ J ]. Clin Orthop Re|at Res, 1997, (335) :89-100.
  • 4Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Assessment of treatment of low back pain [J]. J Jpn Orthop Assoc, 1986,60 : 391-394.
  • 5Fairbank JC ,Couper J ,Davies JB. The Oswestry low back pain dis- ability questionnaire [J ]. Physiotherapy, 1980,66 ( 8 ) : 271-273.
  • 6Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 Health Survey : Manual and Interpertation Guide [ M ]. 2nd Edition. Rhode Island : QualityMetric, 1997.
  • 7Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain I. Aspects of the reliabili- ty and validity of the visual analogue scale [J 1- Pain, 1983,16 ( 1 ) : 87-101.
  • 8Ditunno JF Jr,Young W,Donovan WH,et al. The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association[J]. Paraple- gia, 1994,32(2) :70-80.
  • 9马立泰,刘浩,龚全,李涛,宋跃明,曾建成,刘立岷.胸腰椎骨折前路手术椎体螺钉植入角度与术后侧方成角的关系分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2009,23(11):1329-1333. 被引量:8
  • 10王清,钟德君,谭美云,徐杨博,侯宗亮.胸腰椎骨折伴截瘫前路减压固定术并发症分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(2):116-120. 被引量:38

二级参考文献37

  • 1王清,钟德君,谭美云,徐杨博,侯宗亮.胸腰椎骨折伴截瘫前路减压固定术并发症分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(2):116-120. 被引量:38
  • 2张波,潘显明,权毅,谭映军,邓少林,马泽辉,廖冬发,荣卫平.胸腰段脊柱骨折前后路内固定器的临床对比[J].四川医学,2005,26(1):49-50. 被引量:8
  • 3第二届颈椎病专题座谈会纪要[J].中华外科杂志,1993,31(8):472-476. 被引量:2441
  • 4Wood KB, Bohn D, Mehbod A. Anterior versus posterior treatment of stable thoracolumbar brust fracture without neurologic deficit: a prospective, randomized study. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18(Suppl 1): S15-S23.
  • 5Muller U, Berlemann U, Sledge J, et al. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit by indirect reduction and posterior instrumentation: bisegmental stabilization with monosegmental fusion. Eur Spine J, 1999, 8(4): 284-289.
  • 6Sasso RC, Best NM, Reilly TM, et al. Anterior-only stabilization of three-column thoracolmbar injuries. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18 Suppl 1: S7-14.
  • 7Dai LY, Iiang LS, Jiang SD. Anterior-only stabilization using plating with bone structural autograft versus titanium mesh cages for two- or three-column thoracolumbar fractures: a prospective randomized study. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(14): 1429-1435.
  • 8Kraemer WJ, Schemitsch EH, Lever J, et al. Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Orthop Trauma, 1996, 10(8): 541-544.
  • 9Ghanayem AJ, Zdeblick TA. Anterior instrumentation in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1997, (335): 89-100.
  • 10Kaneda K, Taneichi H, Abumi K, et al. Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological deficits. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1997, 79(1): 69-83.

共引文献41

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部