期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌的疗效比较 被引量:3

The Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in the Treatment of Colon Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌的疗效。方法 72例结肠癌患者随机分成腹腔镜组37例和开腹组35例。观察两组患者的手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术后住院时间,并以肛门恢复排气时间作为胃肠功能恢复的指标,监测患者术后并发症的情况。结果腹腔镜组患者平均手术时间较开腹组有明显增长,为(221.6±37.2)min vs.(150.9±27.8)min(P<0.05),而切口长度、术中出血量、肛门恢复排气时间、术后住院时间均优于开腹组,分别为(5.78±0.61)cm vs.(18.74±2.30)cm,(48.6±31.5)ml vs.(129.0±78.9)ml,(21.73±8.91)h vs.(67.32±12.84)h,(5.89±1.53)d vs.(12.62±2.45)d(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组并发症发生率为5.40%(2/37),明显低于开腹组的31.43%(11/35)(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌具有创伤小、恢复快等优点,是一种安全有效的手术方法。 Objective To compare the laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of colon cancer treatment. Methods 72 cases of colorectal cancer patients were randomly divided into laparoscopic group (37 cases) and laparotomy group (35 cases ). The operating time, incision length, volume of intraoperative bleeding, length of postoperative hospital stay and the postoperative complications was recorded. And the anal exhaust time was used as an indicator of the recovery of gastrointestinal function. Results The average oper± ation time of laparoscopic group was significantly increased than the laparotomy group, that was (221.6 ± 37.2 ) minutes vs. ( 150.9 ± 27.8) minutes (P 〈 0.05 ). The length of incisions, the intraoperative blood loss, the length of intestinal exhaust time and the postoperative hospitalization time was better than open surgery group, that was (5.78 ±0.61)cm vs. (18.74 ±2.30) cm,(48.6 ±31.5)ml vs. (129.0 ±78.9) ml,(21.73 ±8.91)h vs. (67.32 ±12.84) hand(5.89±l.53)dvs. (12.62±2.45)d (P〈0.05). The complication rate of laparoscopic group was 5.40% (2/37) , which was significantly lower than the open group 31.43% (11/35 ) (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion It is a safe and effective method of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer with advantazes of mini trauma, quick recovery, and etc.
作者 蒋立新
出处 《中国现代手术学杂志》 2012年第6期412-414,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜检查 剖腹术 结肠肿瘤 laparoseopy lapamtomy colonic neoplasms
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

共引文献16

同被引文献32

  • 1黎红光,张晓军,陈光兰,李国栋,朱雅碧,沈建伟.不同时期结肠憩室的内镜特点及临床分析[J].浙江临床医学,2006,8(3):299-300. 被引量:1
  • 2牟一平,杨鹏,严加费,陈其龙,袁晓明,朱玲华,徐晓武.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):581-583. 被引量:83
  • 3周保军,宋伟庆,闫庆辉,张占学,林林,李冬斌,任鹏涛.腹腔镜手术治疗机械性肠梗阻的应用价值[J].世界华人消化杂志,2007,15(21):2362-2365. 被引量:11
  • 4Park, J Y, Bae J, Lira M C, et al.Laparoscopic and laparotomic staging in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison of feasibility and safety[J].International journal of gynecological cancer, 2008, 18 ( 6 ) : 1202-1209.
  • 5Biscione F M, Couto R C, Pedrosa T M, et al.Factors influencing the risk of surgical site infection following diagnostic exploration of the abdominal cavity[J].Journal of Infection, 2007, 55( 4 ) : 317-323.
  • 6Sesti F, Capobianco F, Capozzolo T, et al.Isobaric gasless laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in uterine myomectomy: a randomized trial[J].Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 ( 4 ) : 917-923.
  • 7Francesco, Feroci, Katrin C, et al.Laparoseopy within a fast-track program enhances the short-term results after elective surgery for resectable colorectal cancer[J].Surgical endoscopy, 2011, 25 ( 9 ) : 2919-2925.
  • 8Manigrasso S, Candioli S, Arcieri G, et al.Incisional hernia prosthetic surgery: a prospective study comparing laparoscopic and open techniques[J].I1 Giornale di chirurgia, 2009, 30 ( 5 ) : 201-214.
  • 9Marerna R T, Perez M, Burlington C K.Comparison of the benefits and complications between laparoseopie and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries[J].Surgieal Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques 2005, 19 ( 4 ) : 525-530.
  • 10Bataille N.Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia. Return of a difficult clinical choice[J].Journal de chirurgie, 2002, 139 ( 3 ) : 130-134.

引证文献3

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部