摘要
目的：以修复后的成功率为分析指标，对铸造金属桩与纤维桩的临床疗效的比较研究进行Meta分析。方法：通过电子和手工检索收集国内2001-2011年铸造金属桩与纤维桩治疗成功率比较的研究文献．根据循证医学方法建立纳入和排除标准，采用ReviewManager4．2软件（Rev Man4．2）对符合条件的所有研究结果进行Meta分析。结果：8篇文献符合纳入标准，文献中包括929例试验对象。铸造金属桩与纤维桩临床疗效比较的Meta分析表明．相对危险度（relative risk，RR）为0．92，95％可信区IN（confidenceinterval，C，）为0．89～0．95。结论：铸造金属桩的治疗成功率低于纤维桩．后者能够更好地保存根管治疗后的患牙．
PURPOSE： This study was designed to use meta analysis to compare the success rate between cast metal posts and fiber posts after root canal therapy. METHODS： The Chinese literatures published between 2001 and 2011 about the differences between the success rate of cast metal posts and fiber posts were collected. The criteria for inclusion and exclusion was established according to evidence-based medicine method. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 4.2 （RevMan 4. 2）. RESULTS： Eight literatures were eligible for inclusion in this meta analysis, 929 patients were involved. The RR（relative risk） and 95% Cl（confidence interval） were 0.92, 0.89-0.95, respectively. CONCLUION： Fiber post has a higher success rate when used in the restoration of endodontieally treated teeth.
出处
《上海口腔医学》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第6期709-713,共5页
Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词
桩核技术
根管治疗
META分析
Post and core technique
Root canal therapy
Meta analysis
