期刊文献+

腹部手术患者术后疼痛知识、信念及行为问卷的编制与信效度检验 被引量:9

Development and reliability & validity of knowledge-attitude-practice questionnaire for abdominalsurgery patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制腹部手术患者术后疼痛知识、信念及行为问卷,为评估和评价患者术后疼痛知信行状况提供测评工具。方法结合临床经验在查阅文献、专家咨询的基础上编制问卷,采用方便抽样对江苏省某三甲医院90例腹部手术患者进行调查,并用SPSS15.0统计软件进行信、效度检验。结果信度分析结果:总问卷和知识、信念及行为3个子问卷的内部一致性信度分别为0.899,0.933,0.903和0.888;3个子问卷的复本信度分别为0.886,0.763和0.821。效度分析结果:知识、信念及行为3个子问卷内容效度系数分别为0.946,0.921和0.949;因子分析表明问卷具有较好的结构效度,经主成分分析和方差最大正交旋转后,每个项目的共性方差均超过0.4。结论本问卷具有较好的信度和效度,可作为评估或评价腹部手术患者术后疼痛知识、信念及行为状况的研究工具。 Objective To develop a knowledge-attitude-practice questionnaire (KAPQ) for abdominal surgery patients, in order to provide an available tool to evaluate the KAP status of patients' postoperative pain. Methods The KAPQ was established on the basis of clinical experience, literature review and expert consultation. Ninety patients with abdominal surgery in a three level hospital in Jiangsu province were chosen by convenient sampling and SPSS was used for the scale reliability and validity. Results The internal consistency reliabilities of the KAPQ and its three subscales were respectively 0. 899,0. 933,0. 903 and 0.888. The copy of reliability of three subscales were respectively 0. 886, 0. 763 and 0. 821. The content coefficients of three subscales were respectively 0. 946, 0. 921 and 0. 949. Factor analysis showed that the questionnaire had good construct validity with a common explaining variance more than 0. 4. Conclusions The KAPQ has good reliability and validity, thus it can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the health-related knowledge-attitude- practice of the abdominal surgery patients' postoperative pain.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2012年第34期4096-4099,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 腹部 术后疼痛 健康知信行 调查问卷编制 信度 效度 Abdomen Postoperative pain Health-related knowledge-attitude-practice Development of questionnaire Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1黄莛庭.腹部外科手术并发症[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.245.
  • 2McCaffery M, Ferrell BR, Pasero C. Nurses' personal opinions about patients' pain and their effect on recorded assessments and titration of opioid doses. Pain Manag Nurs,2000,1(3) :79-87.
  • 3Owen H, McMillan V, Rogowski D. Postoperative pain therapy: a survey of patients' expectations and their experiences. Pain, 1990,41 (3) :303-307.
  • 4Wilder-Smith CH, Schuler L. Postoperative analgesia: pain by choice? The influence of patient attitudes and patient education. Pain, 1992,50 ( 3 ) : 257-262.
  • 5Bines A, Paice JA. Are your pain management skills up-to-date?. Nursing,2005,35 ( 1 ) :36-37.
  • 6Curtiss CP. JCAHO: meeting the standards for pain management. Orthop Nuts,2001,20(2) :27-30,41.
  • 7Hader CF, Guy J. Your hand in pain management. Nuts Manage, 2004,35(11 ) :21-27.
  • 8Lin CC. Barriers to the analgesic management of cancer pain: a coraparison of attitudes of Taiwan Residents patients and their family caregivers. Pain,2000,88 ( 1 ) :7-14.
  • 9林丽英.术前疼痛护理对腹部手术个案术前焦虑、认知与术后疼痛之成效.台湾:高雄医科大学,2002:28-29.
  • 10Hunt K. Perceptions of patients' pain: a study assessing nurses' attitudes. Nurs Stand, 1995,10 (4) :32-35.

共引文献34

同被引文献98

引证文献9

二级引证文献163

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部