摘要
文章比较了《巴黎手稿》与《文心雕龙》的相通之处,认为《文心雕龙》的“道心”论有助于对《巴黎手稿》中“美的规律”的准确理解,使我们得以从价值本源的角度解释《巴黎手稿》的美学难题,从而为会通马克思文论与中国古代文论、进而建设当代文艺学提供了一个思路。
Tills paper compares the same points of Karl Marx's Manuscript of 1844 and Liu Xie's Wen-hsin tiao-lung. It showes that the Tao-Mind theory in Wen-hsin tiao- lung is conducive to the comprhension of the law of aesthetics in Karl Marx's Manuscript of l844. This Comparison enable us to understand the aesthetics baffling problem in Karl Marx's Manuscript of 1844 and to provide a train of thought of fusion between the literature theory of Karl Marx and that of Ancient China.
出处
《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2000年第1期1-5,共5页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家哲学社会科学研究规划基金
1998年青年基金项目!(98CZW001)
关键词
互动诠释
价值本源
《巴黎手稿》
《文心雕龙》
the mutal inter-pretation
the origin of value
Tao-mind
the law of aesthetics