期刊文献+

试论非物质文化遗产跨国争议的仲裁解决机制 被引量:1

On Arbitration Resolution Mechanism of Transnational Dispute of Intangible Cultural Heritage
原文传递
导出
摘要 仲裁机制在非物质文化遗产跨国争议的解决中具有明显的优势。在当前的国际仲裁机构中,常设国际仲裁法院,最适合解决非物质文化遗产的跨国争议。常设国际仲裁法院有必要完善现有仲裁机制,建立一套解决非物质文化遗产跨国争议的特殊机制。这一特殊机制包括设立专门的仲裁庭、成立专家小组、规定友好仲裁等多方面的内容。 The arbitration machining has obvious advantages in settl ing transnational dispute of intangible cultural heritage.Among the current international arbitral agencies,Permant Court of Arbitration is the most suitable institution in settling transnational dispute of intangible cultural heritage.However,it in is necessary for Permant Court of Arbitration to improve existing arbitrate machanism and establish special system.And content of the special machanism includes the establishment of technical arbitral court,expert's group and amiable arbitration,etc.
作者 唐海清
机构地区 贵阳学院
出处 《贵州民族研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期36-39,共4页 Guizhou Ethnic Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"国际法视野下的非物质文化遗产保护问题研究"(11BFX140)的阶段性成果
关键词 非物质文化遗产 跨国争议 仲裁机制 Intangible cultural heritage Transnational dispute Arbitration mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1周忠华,向大军.文化差异·文化冲突·文化调适[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2011,32(2):151-153. 被引量:69
  • 2Brooks W. Daly, Arbitration of International Cultural Property Dispute: The Experience and Initiatives of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, in Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Police, and Pratice, A Collection of Essays, Edited by Barbara T. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 465.
  • 3Brooks W. Daly, Arbitration of International Cultural Property Dispute: The Experience and Initiatives of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, in Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Police, and Pratice, A Collection of Essays, Edited by Barbara T. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 466.
  • 4Ian Barker, Thoughts of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Practition on a International ADR Regime for Repatriation of Cultural Property and Works of Art, in Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Police, and Pratice, A Collection of Essays, Edited by Barbara T. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p, 486.
  • 5Brooks W. Daly, Arbitration of International Cultural Property Dispute: The Experience and Initiatives of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, in Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Police, and Pratice, A Collection of Essays, Edited by Barbara T. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 471.
  • 6Ian Barker, Thoughts of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Practition on a International ADR Regime for Repatriation of Cultural Property and Works of Art, in Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Police, and Pratice, A Collection of Essays, Edited by Barbara T. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 487.
  • 7Ian Barker, Thoughts of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Practition on a International ADR Regime for Repatriation of Cultural Property and Works of Art, in Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Police, and Pratice, A Collection of Essays, Edited by Barbara T. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 485-487.
  • 8刘慧群.全球化语境下民族文化的传承问题[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2010,31(2):68-72. 被引量:12

二级参考文献11

  • 1王葎.建构现代中国社会的价值认同[J].探索,2006(1):174-178. 被引量:21
  • 2简明不列颠百科全书(中文版):第8卷[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1986.
  • 3库伯.社会科学百科全书(中文版)[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1989.
  • 4Olson,M.The Process of Social Organization[M].New York:Hoh,Rinehart,and Winston,1978.
  • 5Hofstede,G.Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions[C]//J.Deregowski,S.Dzuirawiec,& R.Annis.Explications in cross--cultural psychology.Lisse,Netherlands:Swets & Zeitlinger,1983.
  • 6Frederick L.Shiels,Ethnic Separatism and World Polities,Lanham,MD:University press of America,1984.
  • 7乔治·麦克林,邹诗鹏.全球化与存在论差异[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2006.
  • 8.马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.79.
  • 9中共中央关于构建社会主义和谐社会若干重大问题的决定[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
  • 10周忠华,易小明.原初态与生成性:对文化差异的考察[J].大理学院学报(综合版),2008,7(9):8-11. 被引量:4

共引文献79

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部