期刊文献+

大学英语写作能力构念的操作定义研究

An Investigation into the Operational Definition of the Construct of College English Writing Ability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用问卷形式对广州市7所高校的179位大学英语教师进行了写作能力构念调查,旨在揭示大学英语写作能力构念的操作定义。问卷调查数据和因子分析结果表明:大学英语写作能力构念主要包括论证逻辑性、语言准确性、语言得体性、卷面、语言多样性、组织结构等6个文本特征。此结果为从操作层面界定大学英语写作能力构念提供了证据。 This article describes an investigation into the construct of College English writing ability by sending questionnaire to 179 experienced College English teachers in Guangzhou. The research's purpose is to disclose the operation definition of the construct. The results of factor analysis indicate that the construct can be operationally defined in terms of 6 text features: logic of argumentation, language accuracy, language appropriateness, face value, language complexity and organization. The findings need triangulating before applied in teaching and testing practice.
作者 徐鹰
出处 《大学英语教学与研究》 2012年第6期70-75,共6页 College English Teaching & Research
关键词 大学英语 写作能力构念 操作定义 问卷调查 College English construct of writing ability operational definition questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1East, M. & Young, D. Scoring L2 writing samples: Exploring the relative effectiveness of two different diagnostic methods[J]. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics,2007,13 ( 1 ) : 1-21.
  • 2Fulcher, G. & Davidson, F. Language Testing and Assessment [ M ]. New York : Routledge,2007.
  • 3Hamp-Lyons, L. Rating nonnative writing: The trouble with holistic scoring[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 1995(29): 759-762.
  • 4Knoch, U. Diagnostic assessment of writing : A comparison of two rating scales[J]. Language Testing, 2009,26(2) : 275-304.
  • 5Shaw, S. & Weir, C. Examining Writing: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Writing [ R ]. Cambridge: Cambridge ESOL/Cambridge University Press,2007.
  • 6Shi L. Native- and nonnative-speaking EFL teachers' evaluation of Chinese students' English writing [ J ]. Language Testing, 2001,18 ( 3 ) : 303-325.
  • 7Weigle, S.C. Assessing Writing [ M ]. Cambridge : CUP,2002.
  • 8Bacha, N. Writing evaluation: What can analytic versus holistic essay scoring tell us? [J]. System, 2001(29) : 371-383.
  • 9Cumming, A. , Kantor, R. , & Powers, D. Scoring TOEFL Essays and TOEFL 2000 Prototype Writing Tasks: An Investigation into Raters' Decision Making and Development of a Preliminary Analytic Framework. TOEFL Monograph Series MS-22 [ R ]. Princeton, N J: Educational Testing Service ,2001.
  • 10Domyei, Z. Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing [ M ]. Mahwah, N J: Erlbaum, 2003.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部