摘要
不当得利返还范围的确定是实现不当得利制度之机能的关键性问题,然而目前学界关于不当得利返还范围的界定标准存在诸多不完善之处,其主要表现在对不当得利制度机能的机械理解,没有从不当得利的类型化角度出发来细致的考察受益人不同主观状态下不当得利的返还范围,甚至有忽略民法中自己责任这一基本原则之嫌。鉴于此,文章试图对不当得利的返还范围进行再追踪,以求针对这些不足之处给出自己的一孔之见,以期为完善我国不当得利之立法有所裨益。
The determination of the scope of unjust enrichment return is the key issue to realize the function of unjust enrichment, but now in the academic circle there are many imperfections on the standard for the scope of unjust enrichment return defining, which mainly illustrates in the rigid understanding of the function of un- just enrichment system, determining the scope of unjust enrichment return without meticulous investigation under different subjective state of beneficiary from the types of unjust enrichment and even ignoring the own responsibility principle of civil law. For the above, this paper tries to trace the scope of unjust enrichment re- turn in order to give my point on these deficiencies and then perfect our country's legislation of unjust enrich- ment.
出处
《天津法学》
2012年第4期25-31,共7页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
不当得利
返还范围
机能
类型化
主观方面
unjust enrichment
the scope to return
function
stereotype
subjective aspects