期刊文献+

“尊严”概念于生命伦理学无用吗? 被引量:4

Is the Concept of “Dignity” Useless to Life Ethics?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "尊严"于生命伦理学有用还是无用,是当前国际生命伦理学界的一个争论焦点。本文在回应"无用论"的同时,论证指出:第一,"尊严"不能被等同于"尊重",它有超出"尊重"的内涵"盈余";第二,在生命伦理学中,人的"尊严"不仅有用而且有大用,它是生命伦理学的基本价值观,其所内涵的"人的生命尊严"就是生命伦理学的核心价值。护卫生命的尊严就是生命伦理学的宗旨和使命。第三,"尊严"在实际应用时一般需要过渡和转化,即从价值观过渡和转化为根本伦理原则和若干基本原则;从价值转化为道德权利和法律权利。 Whether the concept of "human dignity" is useful or useless in the study of life ethics has be- come a main argument in the international academia of life ethics currently. This paper argues against the opin- ion that "Dignity is a useless concept in the study of life ethics". The paper holds that the concept of "dignity" cannot be viewed as an equivalent of "respect" because it has much broader and more profound surplus conno- tations than the latter. In the second place, the concept of "human dignity" in the study of life ethics is not merely being useful, but being of "great use" because it denotes the very basic values of life ethics and the con- notation of "human dignity of life" serves as one of its core values. Therefore, maintaining the dignity of life is the key purpose and mission of life ethics. Thirdly, the concept of "dignity" in practical ethics studies needs to be transmitted and transformed, in which life values are transmitted and transformed into the cardinal ethic prin- ciple and other basic principles and, in turn, into moral rights and legal rights.
作者 韩跃红
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第6期1-6,共6页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"人的尊严在生命化理学中的理论地位和社会应用"(11B2X074)
关键词 人的尊严 生命尊严 尊重 尊严权 生命伦理 human dignity life dignity respect right of respecting life ethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Ruth Macklin. Dignity is a Useless Concept--It Means no More than Respect for Persons or their Autonomy [J]. BMJ, 2003, 327 (1): 190-420.
  • 2The President's Council on Bioethics. Human Dignity and Bioeth ics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethies [C]. Washington, D. C. : Presi- dent's Council on Bioethics, 2008.
  • 3美国国家生物医学与行为研究人体受试者保护委员会.贝尔蒙特报告--保护人体研究受试者的道德伦理准则与指导方针[EB/OL].[1979-04-18].http://wenku.baidu.com/view/4f4e381714791711ec791758.html.
  • 4辞海在线查询[EB/OL].http://www.k366.com/gj/cihai/two.asp?id=98865.
  • 5联合国.联合国宪章[S].联合国手册,1945.
  • 6联合国.世界人权宣言:第217A(III)号决议[S].联合国手册,1948.
  • 7康德.道德形而上学的基础[M].周辅成.西方伦理学名著选辑:下卷.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
  • 8甘绍平.作为一项权利的人的尊严[J].哲学研究,2008(6):85-92. 被引量:76
  • 9韩跃红,孙书行.人的尊严和生命的尊严释义[J].哲学研究,2006(3):63-67. 被引量:69
  • 10韩跃红,绪宗刚.尊严的价值内涵及伦理意义[J].伦理学研究,2011(1):22-26. 被引量:22

二级参考文献44

  • 1梁慧星.中国人身权制度[J].中国法学,1989(5):90-97. 被引量:33
  • 2翟振明.康德伦理学如何可以接纳对功利的考量[J].哲学研究,2005(5):80-85. 被引量:10
  • 3韩跃红,孙书行.人的尊严和生命的尊严释义[J].哲学研究,2006(3):63-67. 被引量:69
  • 4Ruth Macklin. Dignity is a Useless Concept[J]. BMJ, 2003,327 : 1 190-1 420.
  • 5The President' s Council on Bioethics. Human Dignity and Bioeth ics:Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics [C]. Washington, D. C. : President' s Council on Bioethics, 2008.
  • 6President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medi cine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forgo Life-sustaining Treatment [M]. Washington, DC: US Govern ment Printing Office, 1983:24.
  • 7President's Council on Bioethics. Human Cloning and Human Dignity[C]. Washington, DC: President’ s Council on Bioethics, Hu man Cloning and Human Dignity, 2002.
  • 8Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genetics and human behavior[R/ OL].(2006-09-07) [2008-09-02]. http://www, nuffieldbioethics, org/go/ourwork/behaviouralgenetics/publication _ 311. ht ml.
  • 9Stanley M. Gianner. Dignity is a Moral Imperative[J/OL]. (2003-12-25)[2008-09 -02]. http://www, bmj. com/cgi/eletters/327/ 7429/1419 # 44696.
  • 10康德.道德形而上学基础[M]//周辅成.西方伦理学名著选辑.北京:商务印书馆,1996:371.

共引文献174

同被引文献48

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部