期刊文献+

一种新的交叉效率保序方法研究——与纳什讨价还价交叉效率保序方法的比较 被引量:1

A New Rank Preservation Research in Cross Efficiency Method ——By Contrasting the Nash Bargaining Rank Preservation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 交叉效率评估方法中在引入新的决策单元(DMU)时,可能会使原先的DMU排序发生变化,很难保序,给决策带来困惑。通过建立一个线性规划模型,求解各DMU最优权重,使其计算的各DMU综合交叉效率值与原综合交叉效率值的差值最小,进而可消除引入新DMU时所产生的逆序现象。最后用算例说明了该方法有效,计算结果与纳什讨价还价交叉效率保序性模型进行比较,效率值差异更小,计算量更小,各DMU权重更加合理。 when new DMUs are added in the cross efficiency method,the original rank of the DMUs may be changed,and it is difficult to rank preservation.Furthermore,it may the confusion to the decision-making.A linearity program model is built and the best weight of all the DMUs is gained by computing,which can make the difference of all the DMUs be least between the synthesized cross efficiency and original cross efficiency,and may eliminate the contradictory ranking.Lastly,an empirical example is illustrated to examine the validity of the proposed method.The result is improved by contrasting the Nash bargaining rank preservation model.The DMUs’weight is more rational,and the cross efficiency difference and the total compute work are less in the new model.
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2013年第1期174-176,共3页 East China Economic Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71073079) 南京航空航天大学产学研理论研究专项(NC2012009)
关键词 DEA 交叉效率 权重 保序 纳什讨价还价 DEA cross efficiency weight rank preservation Nash Bargaining
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Charnes A , Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring t he efficien- cy of decision making unit s [J]. European Journal of Opera- tional Research, 1978,2 (6) : 429-444.
  • 2Sexton T R, Silkman R H, Hogan A J. Data envelopment analy- sis:critique and extensions [ C]//Silkman R H. Measuring effi- ciency: an assessment of data envelopment analysis. San ran- cisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986: 73-105.
  • 3Doyle J R, Green R H. Cross Evaluation in DEA :improving dis- crimination among DMUs [J]. I N FOR, 1995,33 (3) :205-222.
  • 4章志敏,徐梅芳,徐泽水.层次分析法中新元素导入的保序性条件[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,18(9):86-90. 被引量:17
  • 5吴杰,梁樑.交叉效率评价方法中新单元导入的保序性[J].系统工程,2006,24(7):111-115. 被引量:16
  • 6高策理,李长青.一种用于评估排序的交叉效率方法的改进[J].系统工程,2003,21(3):83-86. 被引量:10
  • 7Anderson T R, Hollingsworth K B, Inman L B. The fixed weighting nature of a cross evaluation model [J].Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2002,18 ( 1 ) : 249-255.
  • 8Boussofiane A, Dyson R G, Thanassoulis E. Applied data en- velopment analysis [J].European Journal of Operational Re- search, 1991,52(1 ) : 1-15.
  • 9王科,魏法杰.三参数区间交叉效率DEA评价方法[J].工业工程,2010,13(2):19-22. 被引量:7
  • 10Doyle J R , Green R H. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA:derivations , meanings and uses [J ]. Journal of the Operational Research Society , 1994 , 45 (5): 567-578.

二级参考文献58

共引文献72

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部