期刊文献+

体外冲击波治疗网球肘的镇痛效果研究 被引量:23

The analgesia effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for tennis elbow
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨体外冲击波治疗网球肘的即刻镇痛效应及累积效应。方法:使用国产电磁式体外冲击波治疗机治疗45例网球肘患者,5日1次,共3次。分别在每次治疗前、治疗后、疗程结束后1周,采用现时疼痛状况(PPI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Mills征评定进行疗效评价。结果:3次治疗后即刻均比治疗前疼痛程度显著降低,差异有显著性意义(P<0.001)。在治疗间歇期,疼痛较上次治疗后即刻增加,差异有显著性意义(P<0.001),但均比上次治疗前的疼痛程度低(P<0.001),疗程结束后疼痛程度显著减轻,由治疗前的(2.29±0.76)分降到治疗后的(0.74±0.52)分。治疗后VAS评分比上次评定均有显著改善,由治疗前的(5.06±1.51)分降到治疗后的(1.99±1.82)分。治疗前Mills征阳性率为95.6%,3次治疗后阳性率分别为86.7%、64.4%、33.3%,差异有显著性意义(P<0.001)。结论:体外冲击波治疗网球肘具有显著的即刻镇痛效果,多次治疗后的镇痛作用有累积效应。 Objective: To study the analgesia effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in tennis elbow. Method: Forty-five patients with persistent tennis elbow received 3 times ESWT with 5 days intervals. The analgesia effect was assessed by present pain intensity (PPI), visual analogue scale (VAS) and Mills sign at the same day before and after treatment, and 1 week later of the last time treatment. Result: The analgesia effect after each treatment was obviously excellent than that before each treatment(P〈0.001). At the intermission the pain increased, the PPI scores before next treatment were higher than that of former post-treatment (P〈0.001), but were lower than that of former pre-treatment (P〈0.001). At 1 week follow-up, the PPI scores and VAS scores decreased from (2.29±0.76) to (0.74±0.52) and (5.06±1.51) to (1.99±1.82) respectively, the positive rate of Mills sign decreased from 95.6% to 33.3%. Conclusion: ESWT has significantly immediate analgesia effect and accumulation effect of repeated treatment for tennis elbow.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期32-35,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基金 2010年佛山市科技发展专项资金项目(201008025)
关键词 体外冲击波 网球肘 镇痛 现时疼痛状况 累积效应 extracorporeal shock wave therapy tennis elbow analgesia present pain intensity accumulation effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1曲绵域,于长隆.实用运动医学[J].第4版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2003.500.
  • 2Speed CA, Nichols D, Richards C, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis-a double blind randomized controlled trial[J]. J Orthop Res, 2002, (20): 895-898.
  • 3Ogden JA, Alvarez RG, Levitt R, et al. Shock wave therapy (Orthotripsy) in musculoskeletal disorders[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, (387):22-40.
  • 4高想,吕建林,孙福荣,葛广勇,黄伸.体外冲击波在腱止点末端病中的应用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2010,25(8):795-797. 被引量:34
  • 5李建华,许志生,韩照歧,尤玲华,吴涛.体外冲击波治疗运动员腱性组织及骨关节损伤临床疗效分析[J].中国运动医学杂志,2008,27(3):348-350. 被引量:6
  • 6安华,李小雯,于长隆.应用体外冲击波治疗末端病的疗效观察[J].中国运动医学杂志,2004,23(3):297-299. 被引量:40
  • 7Pettrone FA, McCall BR, Extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia for chronic lateral epicondylitis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, 87(6):1297-1304.
  • 8Maier M, Stabler A, Lienemann A, et al. Shockwave application in calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder- prediction of outcome by imaging[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2000, 120 (9):493-498.
  • 9Chen HS, Chen LM, Huang TW. Treatment of painful heel syndrome with shock waves[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, (387):41 -46.
  • 10Perlick L, Luring C, Bathis H, et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave treatment for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: experimental and clinical results[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2003, 8(6):777-783.

二级参考文献51

共引文献113

同被引文献264

引证文献23

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部