期刊文献+

我们怎样思维:信念结构理论及其应用 被引量:1

How We Think:A Theory on the Structure of Belief System
原文传递
导出
摘要 "我们怎样思维"提问的对象是个人思维的状况,触及教育研究的认识论基础。在这个问题上,教育研究领域广为接受的答案来自杜威的反省思维理论。但是,这种规范性的回答,并未照顾个体的实际心理需求。文章将信念结构理论作为一种补充理论,进行了简要地介绍。基于信念结构理论,个体的信念系统包含"心理-逻辑"结构,同时服务于认识和心理保护两种需求。这种对个人认识活动的判断,与反省思维理论的观点差异巨大。基于此,教育研究者的许多概念前设都将面临观念更新的要求。 How we think? The purpose of this question is to make a detail inquiry into the characteristics of human mind. The answers to this question constitute the epistemologieal basis for educational research. By far the most influential solution to this problem was developed by John Dewey in his milestone work How We Think, first published in 1910 and revised in 1933. The drawback of this answer is that the actual psychological needs of human beings are neglected. This article provided a sketch introduction to the theory on the structure of belief system, as a supplement to Dewey ' s thesis. Based on the newly introduced theory, the belief system is more properly to be described as a ' psycho - logical' structure which is suitable to perform cognitive and protective functions. This new description on the human mind is very different to the old edition which is pro- vided by the theory of reflective thinking. I suggested that educational researcher should renewal their thinking so as to make sense of those differences and get more promising preconceptions.
作者 丁道勇
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期95-104,共10页 Global Education
基金 "中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"(项目编号:702105562GK)资助
关键词 我们怎样思维 反省思维理论 信念结构理论 how we think reflective thinking a theory on the structure of belief system
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1[美]杜威.我们怎样思维?经验与教育[M].姜文闵译.北京:人民教育出版社,1991.6.2.5.13.15,85.26.
  • 2Polanyi,M. Personal knowledge: Towards a post - critical philosophy [ M] ? New York: Harper & Row,1964: 265.
  • 3Scheffler, I. Conditions of knowledge : An introduction to epistemology and education [ M ]. Glenview :Scott Foresman ’ 1965 : 77 - 83.
  • 4【美】伯格,【德】卢克曼.现实的社会建构[M].汪涌译.北京:北京 大学出版社,2009.
  • 5Eisner,E. Aesthetic modes of knowing[ A]. In E. Eisner (Ed. ). Learning and teaching: The ways ofknowing (pp. 23 - 36) [ C]. Chicago, 111. National Society for the Study of Education, 1985.
  • 6van Manen,M. On the epistemology of reflective practice[ J]. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,1995: 33 -50.
  • 7Kinchleoe, J. L. Teachers as researchers : Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment [ M ]. London :Falmerm, 1990.
  • 8Rodgers, C. Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking[ J]. TeachersCollege Record, 2002 ( 6 ) : 884 — 866.
  • 9Jackson, P. How we think we think[ J]. Teachers College Record, 2012(2) : 1 - 17.
  • 10Gelter, H. Why is reflective thinking uncommon [ J ]. Reflective Practice, 2003 (3) : 337 -344.

同被引文献10

  • 1赫尔巴特.普通教育学教育学讲授纲要[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2002.407,406,24,24.
  • 2布鲁纳.教育过程[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1973..
  • 3Hidi, S. Interest: A unique motivational variable [J]. Educational Research Review, 2006(1) : 69-82.
  • 4Dewey, J. Interest and effort in education[M]. Cambridge, MA: Riverside, 1913:95-96.
  • 5Dewey, J. How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process[M]. 2^nd ed. Boston, MA: Heath, 1933:40.
  • 6Peters, R. S. Ethics and education[M]. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1966..168.
  • 7Arnold, F. Attention and interest: A study in psychol-ogy and education [M]. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1910:186.
  • 8Silvia, P. J. Exploring the psychology of interest[M]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 9杜威.教育中的兴趣和努力[G].任钟印,译.//杜威.学校与社会·明日之学校.北京:人民教育出版社,1994:167-213.
  • 10杜威.平民主义与教育[M].常道直,编译.上海:商务印书馆,1922:142.

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部