摘要
《刑事诉讼法》将"鉴定结论"修改为"鉴定意见",从而确立了事实认定的主体应为司法工作人员,而非鉴定人。但在司法实践中,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人申请补充鉴定或重新鉴定的理由却无法真正得到司法人员的回应。鉴定意见的质证有效性不仅有赖于鉴定人出庭接受交叉询问,更需要借助专家辅助人员的专业性意见。鉴定意见的采信必须以法官的心证公开原则为保障。
The expert conclusion is modified to the expert opinion in the code of criminal procedure,that is mean the subject of the fact finding is the judicial personnel,not the identifier.The application to identification of reason of the criminal suspect or the defendant is unable to get a response from the judicial personnel.The interrogation validity of the expert opinion not only depends on the identification of human appearing in court for cross-examination,but also depends on the expert auxiliary personnel professional advice.The acceptance of the expert opinion bases on the overt inner conviction.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期99-103,共5页
Legal Forum
关键词
鉴定意见
事实认定
质证
心证公开
the expert opinion
the fact finding
Court testimony
the overt inner conviction
