期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹行左半肝切除治疗原发性肝癌近期疗效及安全性的系统评价 被引量:15

Short-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic versus Open Left Hepatectomy for Primary Cancer: A Systematic Review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价腹腔镜与开腹行左半肝切除的近期疗效及安全性。方法计算机检索CENTRAL(2012年第1期)、MEDLINE/PubMed(1978~2012)、EMbase(1966~2012)、CBM(1978~2012)、CNKI(1979~2012)和中华医学会数字化期刊系统(1990~2012),收集比较腹腔镜与开腹行左半肝切除的临床试验,并手检相关会议论文及追溯纳入文献的参考文献。由2位评价者根据纳入标准筛选文献、提取资料并评价质量后,采用RevMan5.0版软件进行Meta分析。结果未获得随机对照试验,最终仅纳入5个临床同期对照试验,共319例患者。Meta分析结果显示:腹腔镜组手术时间长于开腹切除组[WMD=40.89,95%CI(29.39,55.38),P<0.000 01],术中出血量少于开腹切除组[WMD=–107.84,95%CI(–208.96,–6.73),P=0.04],而术后住院天数[WMD=–3.78,95%CI(–9.60,2.04),P=0.20]及术后并发症[WMD=0.69,95%CI(0.37,1.29),P=0.25]方面差异均无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜左半肝切除术作为一种微创技术,与开腹左半肝切除术相比,具有腹壁切口较小、术中出血量较少等优点,利于提高患者的生活质量。受纳入研究的数量和质量所限,尚不能判断偏倚对结论可靠性的影响程度。建议今后开展更多高质量大样本多中心且随访时间足够的相关研究以获取更可靠的证据。 Objective To evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety oflaparoscopic versus conventional open left hepatectomy. Methods Databases including CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2012), MEDLINE/PubMed (1978 to 2012), EMbase (1966 to 2012), CBM (1978 to 2012), CNKI (1979 to 2012) and the Chinese Medical Association Figures Journal Systems (1990 to 2012) were searched to collect clinical trials on laparoscopic versus conventional open left hepatectomy. Relevant proceedings and references of the included studies were also retrieved manually. According to the inclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan5.0 software. Results No randomized controlled trials were collected, and a total of 5 clinical concurrent controlled trials involving 319 patients were included finally. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the conventional open group, the laparoscopic group was longer in the operation time (WMD=40.89, 95%CI 29.39 to 55.38, P〈0.000 01), and was lower in the intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-107.84, 95%CI -208.96 to -6.73, P〈0.04); but there was no significant difference be- tween the two groups in terms of hospital stays (WMD=-3.78, 95%CI -9.60 to 2.04, P=0.20) or postoperative complications (WMD=0.69, 95%CI 0.37 to 1.29, P=0.25). Conclusion As a minimally invasive technique, laparoscopic left hepatectomy has advantages of small abdominal incision and less intraoperative blood loss, and it is helpful to improve the quality of life for patients. Due to the limitation of quantity and quality of the included studies, it is hard to estimate the impact of bias on the reliability of this conclusion. We advise to perform more high quality, large scale and multicenter studies with adequate follow-up in the future.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2013年第1期26-30,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 卫生部医药卫生科技发展研究中心资助项目(编号:w2011TNB54)
关键词 腹腔镜手术 开腹左半肝切除 系统评价 META分析 临床对照试验 Laparoscopic surgery Open left hepatectomy Systematic review Meta-analysis Clinical controlled trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1冯交喜,主编.肝胆胰外科理论与实践.北京:科学出版社,2007:368-369.
  • 2Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, et al. Laparoscopic liver resec- tions: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg, 2000, 232(6): 753- 62.
  • 3Higgins JPT, Mtman DG (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins IPT, Green S(editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 (updated February 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Avail- able from Vl. cochrane-bandbook, org.
  • 4吴泰相,刘关键.隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):222-225. 被引量:174
  • 5Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D Amicor R, et al. Evalusting non-randomized intervention studies. Health Technol Assess, 2003, 7(27): 171-173.
  • 6Lesurtel M, Cherqui D, Laurent A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study. J Am Coll Surg, 2003, 196(2): 236-242.
  • 7Endo Y, Ohta M, Sasaki A, et al. A comparative study of the long- term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open left lateral hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009, 19(5): 171-174.
  • 8Aldrighetti L, Pulitan6 C, Catena M, et al. A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy, l Gas- trointest Surg, 2008, 12(3): 457-462.
  • 9Abu HM, McPhail MJ, Zeidan B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: A comparative study. Eur J Surg On- col, 2008, 34(12): 1285-1288.
  • 10愈图南,蔡秀军.腹腔镜下左半肝切除治疗肝内胆管结石的研究.浙江大学,2011.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Jadad AR. Randomised controlled trials, A user's guide.[2007-01-26]http://www.cgmh.org.tw/intr/intr5/c6700/OBGYN/F/Randomized%20tial/chapter I .html.
  • 2Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, et al. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med, 1983, 309:1359-1361.
  • 3Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias:dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA, 1995, 273: 408-412.
  • 4Schulz KF. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA,1995, 274: 1456-1458.
  • 5Pildal J, Chan AW, Hrebjartsson A, et al. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BM./, 2005, 330: 1049.
  • 6Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, et al. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet, 1996, 347:363-366.

共引文献173

同被引文献108

  • 1Belinda Sánchez-Pérez,José Manuel Aranda-Narváez,Miguel Angel Suárez-Muoz,Moises elAdel-delFresno,José Luis Fernández-Aguilar,Jose Antonio Pérez-Daga,Ysabel Pulido-Roa,Julio Santoyo-Santoyo.Fast-track program in laparoscopic liver surgery:Theory or fact?[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2012,4(11):246-250. 被引量:18
  • 2赖俊雄,刘允怡.机器人肝脏手术[J].实用器官移植电子杂志,2014,2(3). 被引量:3
  • 3Makino S, Murata K, Murakami M, et al. Liver damage detected after a hepatectomy for liver metastasis after 12 courses of mFOLFOX6 therapy as an adjuvant chem- otherapy for colorectal cancer[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryo- ho,2012 ,39(12) ;2222-2224.
  • 4Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Marubashi S, et al. Hepatecto- my based on the tumor hemodynamics for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison among the hybrid and pure laparoscopic procedures and open surgery[J]. Surg En- dosc, 2013,27 (2) :610-617.
  • 5Abu HM,McPhail MJ,Zeidan B.Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy:A comparative study[J].European Journal of Surgical Oncology,2008,(12):1285-1288.
  • 6Berentzen TL, Gamborg M, Holst C, et al. Body mass index in child- hood and adult risk of primary liver cancer[J]. J Hepatol, 2014,60 (2) :325 -330.
  • 7Yang WS, Shu XO, Gao J, et al. Prospective evaluation of type 2 dia- betes mellitus on the risk of primary liver cancer in chinese men and women[ J]. Ann Oncol, 2013,24(6) :1679-1685.
  • 8Pingsheng F, Tengyue Z, Qiang H, et al. Basic and clinical research on the therapeutic effect of intervention in primaryliver cancer by targe- ted intra - arterial verapamil infusion [ J ]. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2012,62( 1 ) :59 -67.
  • 9Park YK, Kim BW, Wang HI, et al. Hepatic resection for hepatocellu- lax carcinoma meeting Milan criteria in Child - Turcotte - Pugh class a patients with cirrhosis [ J]. Transplant Proc, 2009,41 (5) : 1691 - 1697.
  • 10邬露丹,徐炜峰,郭建荣,杜金满,喻君.急性等容血液稀释对老年肝切除术患者血浆蛋白、凝血功能的影响[J].现代实用医学,2008,20(2):86-87. 被引量:3

引证文献15

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部