摘要
为实现对不同研究领域甚至不同科学门类间论文学术影响力更为公正的评价,建立由8个指标组成的综合评价体系,并以诺贝尔奖获奖者的代表性论文为参比论文,验证该综合评价体系的客观性和可行性。结果表明,该多指标综合评价指标体系的因子分析法评价值F及其标化值F'在不同门类间比较时较他引量更具合理性,并且能增强具有高学术影响力特征的参比论文的显示度。
To realize more impartial assessment of academic influence of natural science papers across research fields or even scientific disciplines, the paper constructed a comprehensive evaluation system consisting of eight indices, and it adopted the representative articles of laureates of the Nobel Prize as benchmark to verify the objectivity and justice of the system. The result showed that F value and F＇value obtained through factor analysis of the multidimensional comprehensive evaluation system were more reasonable than other - citaiton, as well as raised the visibility of high impact papers when applied to comparison of articles across scientific disciplines.
出处
《科技管理研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期50-55,共6页
Science and Technology Management Research
基金
国家自然科学基金项目"自然科学不同学科和研究领域学术论文影响力评价比较的可行性研究"(70873133)
关键词
科学计量学
绩效评价
综合评价
论文
科学门类
学术影响力
scientometics
performance evaluation
comprehensive evaluation
paper
scientific discipline
academic influence
