期刊文献+

美国布罗迪事件始末及其启示 被引量:1

Details and Inspirations of Scott. J. Brodie Affair in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对研究诚信办公室的设立以及它对布罗迪事件的处理等进行具体的考察,了解美国在治理学术不端行为方面构建了比较健全的体制机制,形成了比较成熟的方式方法,调查和处理过程周密而又严谨,强调诚信和尊重人权,高校能够主动地承担责任和发挥应有的作用。美国的经验具有重要的现实意义,值得我们在进一步加强学术道德建设中充分借鉴。 The specific investigation to the construction of research integrity office and its processing procedure of Scott. J. Brodie case makes to understand the aspects in handling research misconduet in the United States. The United States has built a more sound system and formed more mature ways. Their investigation and processing procedure are thorough and rigorous. They emphasize integrity as well as respect human right. Meanwhile universities can take responsibility actively and play a role. The experience of the United State has an important practical significance, worthyful for reference in strengthening research integrity.
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期224-228,共5页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 河南省普通高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目"高校学术道德与学风建设研究"(2009-JD-019)
关键词 美国 研究诚信办公室 布罗迪事件 学术不端行为 the United State office of research integrity Scott. J. Brodie affair research misconduct
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献19

  • 1威廉.A.布兰彼得.美国科学政策的法律和历史基础[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):289-297. 被引量:17
  • 2Steneck N H. Research universities and scientific misconduct : history, policies, and the future[ J ]. The Journal of Higher Education, 1994,65(3) : 310 -330.
  • 3Department of Health and Human Sevices. Polices and procedures for dealing with possible misconduct in science[ EB/OL] NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. July, 18, 1986, 15 (11) :1. http://grants, nih. gov/ grants/guide/historicalf1986 07 18 Vol_15 No_ll. pdf. 1986-07-18/2007-05-10.
  • 4Brandt E N, Jr. PHS perspectives on misconduct in Science[J]. Public Health Reports, 1983, 98 (2) :136 - ld0.
  • 5Culliton B J. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints[J]. Science, 1990,249 (4966): 240-242.
  • 6Bivens L W. PHS acts to prevent and investigate misconduct in scientific research [ J]. Public Health Reports, 1990, 105(1): 107-108.
  • 7Lyle Bivens, Eliot Marshall. Scientific records and regulations[J]. Science, 1990,248(4962) :1471.
  • 8Hamilton D P. Can OSI withstand a scientific backlash? [J]. Science, 1991, 253 (5024): 1084-1086.
  • 9Hamilton D P. OSI: better the devil you know? [ J]. Science, 1992, 255 (5050): 1344-1347.
  • 10Hallum J V, Hadly S W. NIH office of scientific integrity: polices and procedures [ J ]. Science, 1990, 249 (4974) : 1227 - 1228.

共引文献24

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部