期刊文献+

汇率偏差并不构成法律上的出口补贴——评美国《2011年货币汇率监督改革法案》 被引量:9

Exchange Rate Misalignment Does Not Constitute Export Subsidy at Law——Comment on The Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2011 of the U.S.
原文传递
导出
摘要 标志着美国对人民币汇率掀起新一波进攻狂潮的《2011年货币汇率监督改革法案》以汇率偏差指控为支点,重心在于将汇率偏差等同于出口补贴。抛开汇率偏差在现有国际法律制度中应由《IMF协定》及其授权的IMF辖制姑且不论,即便依WTO有关出口补贴的规则来审视,汇率偏差及其针对的人民币汇率不仅不在《SCM协定》规定的财政资助和收入支持涵盖范围之内,也没有授予中国出口产品和出口商以利益,而且人民币汇率安排是出于广泛的经济、社会稳定和发展而采取的宏观经济政策,而非以出口业绩为条件的事实上的出口补贴。《2011年货币汇率监督改革法案》虽标榜与美国承担的国际义务相符,实际上与之相悖。正因为汇率补贴得不到WTO现有规则的支持,巴西2011年9月在WTO提议建立专门针对汇率偏差的反补贴制度,值得密切关注。 The Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2011 as symbol of new surge from the U.S.against Renminbi exchange rate is mainly based on the accusation of exchange rate misalignment,stressing that such misalignment constitute export subsidy.Judged by WTO rules on export subsidy,not only exchange rate misalignment and Renminbi exchange rate it targets neither fall in the scope of financial contribution and price support defined in the SCM Agreement,nor does Renminbi exchange rate confer any benefit for Chinese exports and exporters,but also Renminbi exchange rate arrangement is part of the macroeconomic policies in pursuit of widespread economic and social stability and development rather than export subsidy contingent on export performances,not to mention that exchange rate falls into the jurisdiction of the IMF Articles of Agreement and the IMF it mandates in prevailing international legal system.Just contrary to what the sponsors claimed,the bill actually runs afoul of the international legal obligations that the U.S.shall undertake.It is because exchange rate subsidy cannot find support in WTO prevailing rules,Brazil proposed to set up an independent set of rule governing exchange rate misalignment in Sept.2011,thus worthy of China's special attention.
作者 韩龙
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期11-23,共13页 Hebei Law Science
基金 2008年国家社会科学基金重点项目<防范和化解国际金融风险和危机的制度建构研究>(08AJY013)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 汇率偏差 出口补贴 财政资助 利益授予 出口业绩 exchange rate misalignment export subsidy financial contribution conferral of benefit export performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1迈克·麦克威尔.WTO与国际经济法[N].法制日报,2000-09-24(4).
  • 2韩龙.论人民币汇率义务的管辖归属和衡量依据[J].法学家,2006(2):106-113. 被引量:23
  • 3Patrick F. J. Macrory,Arthur Edmond Appleton, Michael G. Plummer. The World Trade Organization:Legal, Economic and Political Analysis [ J ]. Springer, 2005, pp. 688 - 689.
  • 4韩龙.人民币汇率补贴论:基于WTO补贴构成条件的审视[J].中外法学,2009,21(3):411-426. 被引量:18
  • 5Bryan Mercurio, Celine Sze Ning Leung. Is China a "Currency Manipulator" ? The Legitimacy of China Exchange Regime un- der the Current International Legal Framework[ J]. International Lawyer, Fall 2009, pp. 1294- 1296.
  • 6Jeanne Lambert, Sascha Rueffer. Export Taxes under WTO Agreement[ J]. Legal Memo, June 2010, pp. 24 -25.
  • 7Jeffrey S. Beekington, Matthew R. Amon. Competitive Currency Depreciation: the Need for a More Effective International Legal Regime[ J ]. Journal of International Business and Law, 2011, pp. 6 - 8.
  • 8David A. Hartquist, Jeffrey S. Beckington. China Policy of Substantially Undervaluing the Renminbi: A Challenge for the In- ternational Monetary and Trading System[J]. Georgetown Economic Services, 15 September 2008, p. 5, footnote 4.
  • 9Appellate Body Report. Canada-Measures Affecting the Export of Civilian Aircraft[ R]. 2 August 1999, Para. 149.
  • 10Panel Report, United States-Preliminary Determinations With Respect To Certain Softwood Lumber From Canada[ R]. 24 April 2002, Paras. 78 - 79.

二级参考文献52

  • 1韩龙.论人民币汇率义务的管辖归属和衡量依据[J].法学家,2006(2):106-113. 被引量:23
  • 2韩龙.GATT第15条:汇率义务衡量需提防的陷阱——基于人民币汇率义务问题的探讨[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2007,25(2):137-144. 被引量:25
  • 3《世界贸易组织乌拉圭回合多边贸易谈判结果法律文本》.法律出版社2000年版,第364页.
  • 4Gary Hufbauer, Claire Brunel, The US Congress and the Chinese Yuan, Papers of the Conference on China's Exchange Rate Policy, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 19 October 2007.
  • 5US - China Business Council, List of all China related legislation introduced in the first session of the 110th congress, http://www. uschina. org/public/documents/2007/110th-congresslegislation-related-to-china. pdf, 28 September 2007.
  • 6H. D. White, The Monetary Fund: Some Criticisms Examined, 23 Foreign Affairs,1944 - 1945, p. 195.
  • 7United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, Second Session of the Preparatory Committee of the UN Conference on Trade and Employment Verbatim Report, E/PC/T/A/PV/32, 23 July 1947, pp. 2 -3.
  • 8WTO《反补贴协定》附件1“出口补贴例示清单”.
  • 9Raj Bhala, World Agricultural Trade in Purgatory: The Uruguay Round Agricultural Agreement and its Implications for the Doha Round, North Dakota Lau Review, 2003.
  • 10WTO《反补贴协定》第1条第1款.

共引文献39

同被引文献44

引证文献9

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部