期刊文献+

新管理主义时代香港社会福利领域NGO之发展 被引量:13

Development of Hong Kong Social Welfare NGOs in the Era of New Public Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全球第三部门正处在发展的十字路口,面临转型的挑战。本文运用个案研究方法,试图探讨20世纪90年代以来新管理主义如何影响香港社会福利领域NGO的发展。研究发现,尽管新管理主义的价值观已深植于NGO领域,但不同个案机构对其影响的回应不尽相同;组织的社会倡导价值对于市场化价值的妥协在本研究中虽有体现,但如何使商界更加关注社会福利的改善正日益成为香港NGO实践其倡导价值的新关注点。 The global third sector is at a turning point and being challenged by the transformation. Using an in-depth case study method, this study investigated how New Public Management (NPM) had influenced the development of social welfare NGOs in Hong Kong since the mid-1990s. This paper first reviews NPM's development and its impact on the market-oriented reform in the area of social welfare in Hong Kong. It then analyzes the influences of these NPM reforms on the social welfare NGOs in regards to their commercialization trends, change in the organizational form, value basis andrelation with the government. The finding suggests that Hong Kong government wants to have some financial relief and that the policy to have lump sum released to better the efficiency of public service does have an impact on the commercialization of the NGOs in the social welfare field, regardless whether it is contracting with the government or it is related to other types of revenues from commercialized items. New management techniques and new management operational structures are being created in response. Commercialized management and the rise of social enterprises are the results of the changes in Hong Kong NGOs' organizational forms. While the penetration of NPM values into NGOs is deep, there are variations across the sample of 12 NG0s. Three types of NGOs can be identified in this study with regard to their different historical origins and functions, namely, operators, pioneers and advocators. Their various strategies in responding to NPM reforms and the changes in their relations to the government are discussed. This article argues that there is evidence of a tradeoff in organizational values for marketization suggested by previous studies. Given the continuing financial austerity and the growing authoritarianism of the government, the future of NGOs and their role in developing civil society in the region is quite uncertain. However, there is still one type of NGOs initiated by professionals in earlier years, and they are working to influence the business sector to realign values towards promoting social welfare as a new focus of advocacy.
作者 田蓉
出处 《社会》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期195-224,共30页 Chinese Journal of Sociology
基金 2011年度国家社会科学基金项目"非营利组织社会企业化运作模式研究"(11CSH053)的阶段性成果之一 香港大学研究生奖学金资助~~
关键词 NGO 新管理主义 商业化 倡导 香港 Non Government Organization (NGO), New Public Management, commercialization, advocacy, Hong Kong
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1范明林.非政府组织与政府的互动关系——基于法团主义和市民社会视角的比较个案研究[J].社会学研究,2010(3):159-176. 被引量:158
  • 2黄源协.2004.从“全控机构”到“最佳价值”——英国社区照顾发展的脉络与省思[J].社区发展季刊(106) :308-330.
  • 3张钟汝,范明林,王拓涵.国家法团主义视域下政府与非政府组织的互动关系研究[J].社会,2009,29(4):167-194. 被引量:102
  • 4Anheier, Helmut. 2005. Nonprofit Organizations : Theory, Management, Policy.New York: Routledge.
  • 5Anheier, Helmut. 2009. “What Kind of Nonprofit Sector, What Kind of Society?:Comparative Policy Reflections. ” American Behavior Scientist 52(7) :1082 - 1094.
  • 6Barzelay, Michael. 2002. “Origins of the New Public Management: An International Viewfrom Public Administration/ Political Science.” In Kate McLaughlin, StephenOsborne and Ewen Ferlie (eds.),New Public Management : Current Trends andFuture Prospects. London and New York: Routledge.
  • 7Bertelli, Anthony. 2006. “Governing the Quango: An Auditing and Cheating Model ofQuasi-Governmental Authorities. ” Journal of Public Administration Research andTheory 16(2) ? 239-261.
  • 8Boehm, Amnon, Eran Vigoda-Gadot, and Nurit Segev. 2011. 44Market Orientation inSocial Services: An Empirical Study of Motivating and Hindering Factors AmongIsraeli Social Workers. ” Administration in Social Work 35(1) : 138 - 160.
  • 9Chow, Nelson. 2004. “Social Welfare in Hong Kong—Post 1997: Opportunities in theMidst of Constraints. ” Journal of Societal & Social Policy 3(3) j 63-76.
  • 10Christensen, Tom and Per Laegreid. 2007. “The Whole-of-Government Approach to PublicSector Reform. ” Public Administration Review 67(6) : 1059 _ 1066.

二级参考文献30

共引文献235

同被引文献188

引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部