对向犯之探究

On Correspondence Offence

对向犯是必要共犯理论探讨的重点,大陆法系国家的判例和理论通说认为若是刑法只明文规定处罚对向者中的一方时,则对没有法律明文规定处罚的对向者中的另一方不能适用总则共犯规定。但是,"没有法律明文规定"的主张提出的根据究竟为何,这一通说能否一般化为总则性的学理规则,是一个值得进一步探讨的问题。通说的观点,欠缺充分的法律说理,不值得采纳。对另一方不罚的理由,应该从法益保护的角度和刑法分则规定各罪的构成要件的具体解释中得出。

Correspondence Offence is the focus of the Indispensable Joint Crime theoretical research.In the Mainland Legal System countries Case and Criminal law theory think when Criminal law stipulates expressly that only one party of Corresponding sides is punished,joint crime regulations in the general provisions of criminal law can not be applied to the other that is not stipulated expressly.But what is the basis of putting forword＂there is no legal provisions＂？ Be the common theory can become a doctrinal generally rule？ These problems still worth further studying.The common theory is not worth being adopted,because of be lack in sufficient legal reasoning.The reason of not punishing the other should be obtained from the angle of propecting legal interest and specific explanation of every criminal composed essentials in the Special Provisions of Criminal Law.