期刊文献+

Cochran-Armitage趋势检验不同赋值的模拟研究 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较Cochran-Armitage趋势检验中三种赋值方法的统计性能,以期为应用趋势检验提供指引。方法应用Monte Carlo模拟方法,以各等级的样本量和阳性率为参数,通过SAS9.2软件编程,比较趋势检验中等距、均秩和MERT三种赋值方法在不同参数组合下的Ⅰ类错误率和检验效能。结果Ⅰ类错误率以等距赋值最低,均秩赋值次之,MERT法最高。三种赋值方法的检验效能非常接近。当有一个等级的阳性率较小时(pi=0.05),三种赋值方法的检验效能普遍偏低。结论综合模拟结果和应用的便利性,有序分类数据的Cochran-Armitage趋势检验采用等距赋值更值得提倡。
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期843-845,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Cochran WG. Some methods for strengthening the common tests[J].Biometrics,1954.417-451.
  • 2Armitage P. Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies[J].Biometrics,1955.375-386.
  • 3Gastwirth JL. The use of maximin efficiency robust tests in combining contingency tables and survival analysis[J].Journal of American Statist,1985.380-384.
  • 4Podgor MJ,Gastwirth JL,Mehta CR. Efficiency robust tests of independence in contingency tables with ordered classifications[J].Statistics in Medicine,1996.2095-2105.
  • 5Bailer AJ,Portier CJ. Effects of treatment-induced mortality and tumorinduced mortality on tests for carcinogenicity in small samples[J].Biometrics,1988.417-431.
  • 6Bieler GS,Willians RL. Ratio Estimates,the Delta Method,and Quantal Response Tests for Increased Carcinogenicity[J].Biometrics,1993.793-801.
  • 7Kendall MG,Staurt A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics[M].London:Griffin,1979.
  • 8Gross ST. On asymptotic power and efficiency of tests of independence in contingency tables with ordered classifications[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1981.935-941.
  • 9Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions[M].New York:wiley,1981.
  • 10Graubar BI,Korn EL. Choice of column scores for testing independence in ordered 2 X K contingency tables[J].Biometrics,1987.471-476.

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部