期刊文献+

基质改良剂对滨海滩涂高钠盐粉土改良效果的试验研究

Test Study on Improving High Sodium Salt Floury Silt in Coastal Beach by Organic Substrate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用桶栽试验,研究了不同施用量下,基质改良剂对江苏滨海高钠盐粉土理化性质及西红柿产量的影响。结果表明,与不使用改良剂处理(CK)相比,施用基质改良剂处理表层土壤干密度降低1.06%~9.39%,孔隙率增加1.10%~9.69%;土壤含盐量减少21.16%~25.64%;基质改良剂处理的土壤,其碱化度(ESP)、pH、土壤交换性Na+、土壤Na+和Cl-均较CK下降,且与基质施用量负相关;各处理土壤Ca2+和SO24-质量摩尔浓度分别较CK增加了150.00%~271.4%和3.8%~88.9%,且与施用量正相关。施用改良剂后,西红柿增产6.04%~30.95%,基质改良剂对江苏省滨海滩涂高钠盐粉砂土具有较好改良效果,其最佳施用量约为8.4~9.0t/hm2。 Different application amounts of organic substrate were used to study their effects on soil physical and chemical properties of the coastal high saline silt from Rudong,Jiangsu Province, as well as the tomato yield by pot experiments. The results showed that organic substrate could reduce soil bulk density by 1.06%-9.39% while increase soil total porosity by 1.10%-9.69% The total salt content of the treated soil with different amounts of organic substrate decreased by 21.16%-25. 64% compared with the control treatment(CK). The soil exchangeable sodium percentage(ESP), pH value(pH), soil exchangeable Na^+ , as well as concentration of Na^+ and Cl^- also declined with the rising application amount of organic substrate. Ca^2+ and SO4^2- concentration of the soil increased by 150.00%-271.4% and 3.8-88.9% respectively compared with CK. Tomato yield increased by 6.04%-30.95% compared with CK. The results above indicated that application of organic substrate was an effective way to improve coastal high sodium salt floury silt and the suitable application amount was about 8.4-9.0 t/hm^2.
出处 《灌溉排水学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期107-110,共4页 Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAC55B06)
关键词 基质 滨海滩涂 高钠盐粉土 土壤理化性质 改良 organic substrate Coastal beach high sodium salt floury silt soil physical and chemical properties soil amendment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献39

  • 1宋长春,邓伟,李取生.松嫩平原土壤次生盐渍化过程模型研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(5):23-26. 被引量:13
  • 2古伯贤,赵哲权,王泽文,贾树龙,张彦才.不同有机物养地供肥机制探讨[J].河北农业科学,1993(3):15-18. 被引量:3
  • 3石元亮,王晶,姜淑华.有机物料改良苏打盐渍土机制的研究——对土壤化学组成及盐碱特性的影响[J].土壤通报,1989,20(4):154-157. 被引量:19
  • 4ADAMS F.Soil Acidity and Liming[M].USA,Madison:American Society of Agronomy,1984:171-266.
  • 5POCKNEE S,SUMNER M E.Cation and Nitrogen Contents of Organic Matter Determine Its Soil Liming Potential[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1997,61(1):86-92.
  • 6WANG N,LI J Y,XU R K.Use of Various Agricultural by-Products to Study the pH Effects in an Acid Tea Garden Soil[J].Soil Use and Management,2009,25(2):128-132.
  • 7GASKIN J W,STEINER C,HARRIS K,et al.Effect of Low Temperature Pyrolysis Conditions on Biechar for Agricultural Use[J].Transactions of the ASABE,2008,51(6):2061-2069.
  • 8CHUN Y,SHENG G Y,CHIOU C T,et al.Compositions and Sorptive Properties of Crop Residue-Derivad Chars[J].Environ mental Science & Technology,2004,38(17):4649-4655.
  • 9NOVAK J M,BUSSCHER W J,LAIRD D L,et al.Impact Biechar Amendment on Fertility of a Southeastern Coastal Plain Soil[J].Soil Science,2009,174(2):105-112.
  • 10CHAN K Y,VAN ZWIETEN L,MESZAROS I,et al.Agronomic Values of Greenwaste Biochar as a Soil Amendment[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research,2007,45(8):629-634.

共引文献312

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部