从族际接触、多元一体到共生互补——对湖南桑植白族“连理会”文本的解读被引量：4

From the Theory of Intergroup Contact,Pattern of Pluralistic Unity of the Chinese Nation to Symbiosis and Mutual Complement——An Analysis of Text “Lian Li Hui” Festival,Sangzhi,Hunan

下载PDF

导出

摘要族际接触理论和多元一体格局下的"文化自觉"理论是研究民族关系的两种重要指导理论。通过对湖南桑植白族"连理会"文本的文化解读,指出散杂居与聚居有明显区别。对散杂居民族关系的研究应与对聚居民族的研究有所不同,应在中华民族多元一体格局下,倡导共生互补的理念,以务实的态度认识和处理当前我国散杂居地区的民族关系和民族问题。 The theory of intergroup contact and pattern of pluralistic unity of the Chinese nation are two important theories in research of relationship between nationalities. Base on the analysis of text ＂Lian Li Hui＂ festival spread in Sangzhi, Hunan. The paper points out that there are distinct differences between areas inhabited by many ethnic groups and habited by one ethnic group, there are obvious distinguish on the research of them. Under the pattern of pluralistic unity, symbiosis and mutual complement would be the best ways to solve modem relationship and problems exist in areas inhabited by many ethnic groups by practical attitude.

作者张丽剑

机构地区中南民族大学民族学与社会学学院

出处《铜仁学院学报》 2012年第6期92-97,共6页 Journal of Tongren University

基金国家社科基金"长江流域散杂居区文化多样性与民族关系研究"(07BMZ003)成果湖北省社科基金"长江中游散杂居区民族关系研究"(BSY07008)成果

关键词族际接触多元一体共生互补白族 the self-study examination of higher education education quality evaluation index

分类号 C956 [社会学—民族学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1湘西土家族苗族自治卅I民间文学集成编委会,编.中国民间故事集成湖南卷·湘西土家族苗族自治州分卷[G].内部资料.
2陈晶,佐斌.群际接触理论介评[J].心理学探新,2004,24(1):74-77. 被引量：32
3沈关宝.从学以致用、文野之别到文化自觉费孝通老师的文化功能论[J].社会,2006,26(2):64-79. 被引量：21
4许宪隆,沈再新.共牛瓦补:构建散杂居地区和谐社会的实践理念[N].中国民族报(理论版)理论版,2008-08-29.

二级参考文献31

1[1]Ben-Ari R,Amir Y.Intergroup contact,cultural information,and change in ethnic attitudes [ A ].In W Stroebe,A W Kruglanski,D Bar-Tal,M Hewstone (Eds.),The Social psychology of intergroup conflict[C].Berlin:Springer,1988.151-165.
2[2]Allport G W.The Nature of Prejudice[M].Reading,MA:Addison-Wesley,1954.537.
3[3]Pettigrew T F,Tropp L R.Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent mcta-analytic findings[A].In S Oskamp (Ed.),Reducing prejudice and discrimination:Social psychological perspectives[C].Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,2000.93-114.
4[4]Pettigrew T F.Intergroup contact theory[J].Annual Review of Psychology,1998,49:65-85.
5[5]Mullen B,Brown R,Smith C.Ingroup bias as a function of salience,relevance,and status:an integration [J].European Journal of Social Psychology,1992,22:103-122.
6[6]Sherif M.In Common Predicament[M].Boston:Houghton Mifflin,1966.192.
7[7]Pettigrew T F.Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice[J].Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin,1997,23:173-185.
8[8]Hewstone M,Brown R (Eds).Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters [C].Oxford:Blackwell,1986.231.
9[9]Brewer M B,Miller N.Beyond the contact hypothesis:theoretical perspectives on desegregation [ A].In N Miller,M B Brewer (Eds.),Groups in contact:The psychology of desegregation[C].Orlando,FL:Academic,1984.281-302.
10[10]Anastasio P,Bachman B,Gaertner S,Dovidio J.Categorization,recategorization and common ingroup identity[A].In R Spears,P J Oakes,N Ellemers,S A Haslam (Eds.),The social psychology of stereotyping and group life[C].Oxford,UK:Blackwell,1997.236-256.