摘要
目的:探讨改良超长方案行体外受精.胚胎移植(IVF-ET)助孕的高龄(年龄≥40岁)且卵巢储备功能低下(窦卵泡3~7个)患者的治疗结局。方法:采用随机对照前瞻研究的方法,将行ⅣF—ET的120例高龄且卵巢储备功能低下患者随机分成:改良超长方案ga(A组,n=55)和拮抗剂方案组(B组,n=65),比较A、B组间IVF—ET结局。结果:A组的Gn使用总量(3955.2±1194.3It.r)、Gn使用天数(11.7±1.9d)、hCG注射日E2水平(2452.7±1285.6pg/m1),hCG注射日子宫内膜厚度(12.1±2.3mm)均明显高于B组(分别为2022.5±610.1IU、9.1±1.7d、1257.7±696.0pg/ml、11.3±2.0mm),P〈0.05;周期取消率、优质胚胎率、妊娠率、着床率、流产率、宫外孕发生率组间均无统计学差异(胗0.05)。A组hCG注射日LH水平(1.0±0.5mlU/m1)及P/E2值(0.3±0.2)明显低于Bgg(3.4±2.4mlU/ml及0.5±0.2),P〈0.05。结论:改良超长方案经过GnRHa的预处理,使患者充分降调节,hcG注射日可以获得良好的LH水平、P/E2值及内膜厚度;而hMG的使用,既可降低患者费用,又可以适当补充LH,提高子宫内膜容受性。因此,对于高龄且卵巢储备功能低下的患者,改良超长方案是一个经济有效的治疗选择。
Objective: To compare IVF outcomes with ultra-long protocol and antagonist protocol in women of low ovarian reserve and advanced age (≥40 years old). Methods: A total of 120 patients aging over 40 years old with low ovarian reserve undergoing IVF (total number of AFC was 3-7) were prospectively randomized into 2 groups: group A, 55 patients were down-regulated with two dosages of GnRHa (ultra-long protocol); group B, 65 patients were subjected to flexible antagonist. All participants met the following inclusion criteria: with less than 3 cycles, with no uterine abnormalities and hydrosalpinges. Results: Gn dosage (3 955.2 ±1 194.3 IUvs2 022.5 ±610.1 IU) and duration (11.7 ±1.9 dvs 9.1 ±1.7 d), E2 level (2 452.7 ± 1 285.6 pg/ml vs 1 257.7 ± 696.0 pg/ml) and endometrial thickness (12.1 ± 2.3 mm vs 11.3± 2.0 mm) on hCG injection day in groupA were higher than those in group B. There were no significant differences in cancellation rate, the number of high-quality embryos, pregnancy rate, implantation rate, abortion rate and pregnancy rate between the two groups. The LH level (1.0 ±0.5 mlU/ml) and P/E2 ratio (0.3± 0.2) in group A were much lower than those in group B (3.4 ±2.4 mIU/ml, 0.5 ± 0.2). Conclusion: Abundant down- regulation with modified ultra-long GnRHa protocol results in a satisfying LH level, P/E2 ratio and endometrial thickness, hMG used in ultra-long GnRI-Ia protocol both decreases expenses and increases endometrial receptivity by supplying LH. Therefore, modified ultra-long GnRHa protocol is a cost-effective and proper choice to older women with low ovarian reserve.
出处
《生殖与避孕》
CAS
CSCD
2013年第1期11-15,共5页
Reproduction and Contraception
关键词
改良超长方案
拮抗剂方案
体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF—ET)
高龄
卵巢储备功能低下
modified ultra-long GnRHa protocol
flexible antagonist protocol
in-vitro fertilization and embryotransfer (IVF-ET)
advanced reproductive age
low ovarian reserve