期刊文献+

行人车辆冲突参数分析与安全评价 被引量:5

Pedestrian-vehicle conflict parameter analysis and safety evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了评价混合交通环境中的行人和车辆冲突的安全性,对比分析了目前常用的行人车辆冲突参数,提出了个体行人和车辆之间冲突的安全评价模型,并将模型应用于不同的混合交通场景,验证模型的鲁棒性和适用性.结果表明,冲突时间差(Time difference to collision,TDTC)和车辆速度对行人车辆冲突的安全性影响最大.TDTC越接近于零,行人越危险;车辆速度越快,行人越危险.以此建立的行人车辆冲突评价模型可正确评估86.2%的行人车辆冲突安全,对于危险冲突的漏检率为2.1%. To evaluate the pedestrian-vehicle conflict safety in mixed traffic condition,this paper analyzes and compares the commonly used parameters on traffic conflict and presents a model to classify independent pedestrian-vehicle conflict safety.The model is validated by using video data from two different traffic scenes.The result shows that the pedestrian-vehicle conflict safety is highly sensitive to the Time Difference to Collision(TDTC) parameter and the vehicle speed.The closer to zero a TDTC value is and the faster a vehicle is,the more dangerous a pedestrian-vehicle conflict may be.Comparing with independent observation,the model can correctly classify about 86.2% conflicts;only 2.1% conflicts are classified as safer by the model.
出处 《哈尔滨工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期123-128,共6页 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60721003 60834001) 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2011AA110401 2012AA112305)
关键词 行人车辆冲突 冲突时间差(TDTC) 车辆速度 行人安全 pedestrian-vehicle conflict time difference to collision(TDTC) vehicle speed pedestrian safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1ISMAIL K, SAYED N. Automated analysis of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts using video data[ J ]. Transportation Research Record,2009, 2140:44-54.
  • 2PETRITSCH T A, CHALLA H, HUANG H, et al. Evaluation of geometric and operational characteristics affecting the safety of six-lane divided roadways: final report, BD 543 RPWO 5 [ R ] Florida: Florida Department of Transportation, 2007.
  • 3KAPARIAS I, BELL M G H, GREENSTED J, et al. Development and implementation of a vehicle-pedestrian conflict analysis method adaptation of a vehicle-vehicle technique [ J ]. Transportation Research Record, 2010, 2010(2198) : 75 -82.
  • 4SVENSSON A, HYDEN C. Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour[ J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2006, 38 (2) : 379 - 385.
  • 5CATER D L, HUNTER W W, ZEGEER C V, et al. Pedestrian and bicyclist intersection safety indices: final report, FHWA-HRT-06-125 [ R]. McLean, VA: FHWA, 2006.
  • 6LAURESHYN A, SVENSSON A, HYDEN C. Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(6) : 1637 - 1646.
  • 7BOUNET L, MIDENET S. Pedestrian crossing detection based on evidential fusion of video-sensors [ J ]. Transportation Research: Part C Emerging Technologies, 2009, 17(5) : 484 -497.
  • 8GETTMAN D, PU L, SAYED T, et al. Surrogate safety assessment model and validation: final report FHWAHRT-08-051 [R]. McLean, Virginia: Federal Highway Administration, 2008.
  • 9HYDEN C. The development of a method for traffic safety evaluation: the Swedish traffic conflict technique [D]. Lund, Sweden: Lurid University, 1987.
  • 10MINDERHOUD M M, BOVY P H L. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2001, 33 (1) : 89 - 97.

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部